Efficacy of simultaneous infusion of tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute anterior choroidal or paramedian pontine infarction: TITACIPPI study

Background and purpose Intravenous thrombolysis combined with tirofiban (IVT plus tirofiban) has been reported to be more effective than IVT alone in preventing early neurological deterioration (END) and improving 3-month functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. This study aimed to assess the radiological efficacy and safety of simultaneous (or within 60 min) IVT plus tirofiban versus IVT alone specifically in patients with anterior choroidal infarction (ACI) or paramedian pontine infarction (PPI), two subtypes with a high risk of END. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including consecutive patients aged ≥18 years treated during two distinct periods: one with standard IVT alone and one with IVT plus tirofiban. The primary endpoint was ≥20% reduction in lesion volume on 24-h diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Secondary endpoints included early clinical improvement at 24 h and 7 days (or discharge), functional independence [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores ≤2 and ≤1] at 3 months, and END. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and major systemic bleeding (MSB). A subgroup analysis compared clinical outcomes in patients with “lesion reversal” versus patients with no “lesion reversal.” Results A total of 58 patients were analyzed (30 IVT plus tirofiban; 28 IVT alone). Lesion reversal ≥20% was more frequently observed in the IVT plus tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio, 8.58; 95% CI, 2.09–35.28; p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between groups for END or 3-month functional outcomes (mRS ≤2 or ≤1). One non-fatal MSB occurred in the IVT alone group. No cases of sICH were observed in either group. Overall lesion reversal was significantly associated with better early and late outcomes, and with IVT plus tirofiban treatment. Discussion and conclusion This study suggests that IVT plus tirofiban improves radiological outcomes and may be a promising therapeutic option in patients with ACI/PPI, without increasing the risk of bleeding compared to IVT alone. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier NCT05733507.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1692576
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of simultaneous infusion of tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute anterior choroidal or paramedian pontine infarction: TITACIPPI study

Manvel Aghasaryan, Moussa Toudou‐Daouda, Nicolas Chausson, Leila Bentamra et al.
Frontiers in Neurology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Efficacy of simultaneous infusion of tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute anterior choroidal or paramedian pontine infarction: TITACIPPI study

Manvel Aghasaryan, Moussa Toudou‐Daouda, Nicolas Chausson, Leila Bentamra, Didier SMADJA, Mohamed Baby, Yann Lhermitte, Nana-Rahamatou Aminou-Tassiou, Djibril Soumah
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose Intravenous thrombolysis combined with tirofiban (IVT plus tirofiban) has been reported to be more effective than IVT alone in preventing early neurological deterioration (END) and improving 3-month functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. This study aimed to assess the radiological efficacy and safety of simultaneous (or within 60 min) IVT plus tirofiban versus IVT alone specifically in patients with anterior choroidal infarction (ACI) or paramedian pontine infarction (PPI), two subtypes with a high risk of END. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including consecutive patients aged ≥18 years treated during two distinct periods: one with standard IVT alone and one with IVT plus tirofiban. The primary endpoint was ≥20% reduction in lesion volume on 24-h diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Secondary endpoints included early clinical improvement at 24 h and 7 days (or discharge), functional independence [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores ≤2 and ≤1] at 3 months, and END. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and major systemic bleeding (MSB). A subgroup analysis compared clinical outcomes in patients with “lesion reversal” versus patients with no “lesion reversal.” Results A total of 58 patients were analyzed (30 IVT plus tirofiban; 28 IVT alone). Lesion reversal ≥20% was more frequently observed in the IVT plus tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio, 8.58; 95% CI, 2.09–35.28; p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between groups for END or 3-month functional outcomes (mRS ≤2 or ≤1). One non-fatal MSB occurred in the IVT alone group. No cases of sICH were observed in either group. Overall lesion reversal was significantly associated with better early and late outcomes, and with IVT plus tirofiban treatment. Discussion and conclusion This study suggests that IVT plus tirofiban improves radiological outcomes and may be a promising therapeutic option in patients with ACI/PPI, without increasing the risk of bleeding compared to IVT alone. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier NCT05733507.

Frontiers in NeurologyVol. 16
Inserm (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien (FR), Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (FR), Obihiro National Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.