“Research is temporary, our experiences are forever”: rethinking ethics of care in participatory research with people with disabilities

Various scholars have discussed how ‘sensitive research’ or working with ‘vulnerable populations’ raises significant ethical considerations. While a feminist ethics of care can ensure a more respectful approach to scientific inquiry, it may also disempower participants through paternalistic research practices. Illustrated by actual research situations, we explore specific instances of practising care in our participatory research with people with disabilities in the Netherlands. By drawing on our personal reflections and those of the co-researchers with disabilities, we aim to contribute to rethinking ethics of care in participatory research and in working with people with disabilities or other ‘vulnerable populations’. We argue that similar research with both vulnerabilities and opportunities for enabling research practices requires care-full and slow methodologies. Within such slow research, a collective interdependence and responsibility can be attended to, surpassing solely procedural forms of research ethics and neoliberal logics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Psychology
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2026.100230
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Research is temporary, our experiences are forever”: rethinking ethics of care in participatory research with people with disabilities

Julia Doornbos
Methods in Psychology
Disability Rights and Representation
article

“Research is temporary, our experiences are forever”: rethinking ethics of care in participatory research with people with disabilities

Julia Doornbos
article en

Abstract

Various scholars have discussed how ‘sensitive research’ or working with ‘vulnerable populations’ raises significant ethical considerations. While a feminist ethics of care can ensure a more respectful approach to scientific inquiry, it may also disempower participants through paternalistic research practices. Illustrated by actual research situations, we explore specific instances of practising care in our participatory research with people with disabilities in the Netherlands. By drawing on our personal reflections and those of the co-researchers with disabilities, we aim to contribute to rethinking ethics of care in participatory research and in working with people with disabilities or other ‘vulnerable populations’. We argue that similar research with both vulnerabilities and opportunities for enabling research practices requires care-full and slow methodologies. Within such slow research, a collective interdependence and responsibility can be attended to, surpassing solely procedural forms of research ethics and neoliberal logics.

Methods in PsychologyVol. 14
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Research is temporary, our experiences are forever”: rethinking ethics of care in participatory research with people with disabilities — Julia Doornbos · Methods in Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS