Development of Uncertainty Sensitivity: Early Competence or Protracted Development?

The development of uncertainty sensitivity, a critical cognitive ability, presents a challenging paradox: Some evidence points to its emergence in infancy, whereas other evidence indicates much later emergence and protracted development. To resolve this paradox, we propose that early uncertainty sensitivity relies on perceptual cues to ignorance (e.g., occluded information), whereas uncertainty monitoring in the absence of such cues develops later. We tested this hypothesis using a random dot kinematogram task that manipulated uncertainty through signal-to-noise ratios, without perceptual cues to ignorance or knowledge. Participants aged 4-6 years and adults (N = 189) made perceptual judgments of the directionality of dot movement or opted out under varying uncertainty levels. While all groups demonstrated above-chance accuracy in perceptual judgments, children and adults differed markedly in their responses to uncertainty. Unlike adults, most children's decisions were not affected by uncertainty. These results suggest that without perceptual cues to ignorance, children struggle to detect, monitor, and respond to uncertainty. We propose that early uncertainty sensitivity found in some studies relies on perceptual cues to ignorance (i.e., bottom-up attentional mechanisms), with strategic uncertainty monitoring developing more gradually. Our findings help reconcile contradictory results in uncertainty sensitivity development and highlight the role of perceptual cues and metacognition in children's decision-making under uncertainty. SUMMARY: Children's uncertainty sensitivity often relies on perceptual cues to ignorance, whereas autonomous uncertainty monitoring without such cues develops later. Without perceptual cues to ignorance, only a minority of 4- to 6-year-olds exhibit uncertainty-driven behavior, despite above-chance perceptual discrimination. Our findings reconcile contradictory evidence about the early versus late emergence of uncertainty sensitivity in the developmental literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Science
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70137
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Uncertainty Sensitivity: Early Competence or Protracted Development?

V. Sloutsky, Qianqian Wan
Developmental Science
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Development of Uncertainty Sensitivity: Early Competence or Protracted Development?

V. Sloutsky, Qianqian Wan
article en

Abstract

The development of uncertainty sensitivity, a critical cognitive ability, presents a challenging paradox: Some evidence points to its emergence in infancy, whereas other evidence indicates much later emergence and protracted development. To resolve this paradox, we propose that early uncertainty sensitivity relies on perceptual cues to ignorance (e.g., occluded information), whereas uncertainty monitoring in the absence of such cues develops later. We tested this hypothesis using a random dot kinematogram task that manipulated uncertainty through signal-to-noise ratios, without perceptual cues to ignorance or knowledge. Participants aged 4-6 years and adults (N = 189) made perceptual judgments of the directionality of dot movement or opted out under varying uncertainty levels. While all groups demonstrated above-chance accuracy in perceptual judgments, children and adults differed markedly in their responses to uncertainty. Unlike adults, most children's decisions were not affected by uncertainty. These results suggest that without perceptual cues to ignorance, children struggle to detect, monitor, and respond to uncertainty. We propose that early uncertainty sensitivity found in some studies relies on perceptual cues to ignorance (i.e., bottom-up attentional mechanisms), with strategic uncertainty monitoring developing more gradually. Our findings help reconcile contradictory results in uncertainty sensitivity development and highlight the role of perceptual cues and metacognition in children's decision-making under uncertainty. SUMMARY: Children's uncertainty sensitivity often relies on perceptual cues to ignorance, whereas autonomous uncertainty monitoring without such cues develops later. Without perceptual cues to ignorance, only a minority of 4- to 6-year-olds exhibit uncertainty-driven behavior, despite above-chance perceptual discrimination. Our findings reconcile contradictory evidence about the early versus late emergence of uncertainty sensitivity in the developmental literature.

Developmental ScienceVol. 29(2)
The Ohio State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.