Service users’ experiences of the remote delivery of psychology assessments and interventions in the community

This article details a service evaluation conducted in a community team for people with learning disabilities at one NHS trust in England to explore service users’ experiences of remote delivery of psychological input during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The team’s psychologists had provided assessments and interventions to service users via telephone or video calls. A retrospective survey was conducted to determine whether remote input was acceptable, effective and could remain an option for the future.Thirty three service users who had directly or indirectly received individual remote psychological input completed the survey, often with support from a carer. Most reported positive experiences, including in terms of privacy, feeling heard and using technology. However, most respondents expressed a preference for face-to-face sessions. The findings suggest that the remote delivery of psychological input can be a feasible and acceptable option for service users who have a learning disability, but that face-to-face appointments should remain the primary method of input offered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Disability Practice
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp.2026.e2296
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Service users’ experiences of the remote delivery of psychology assessments and interventions in the community

Ursula McCann, Birunthika Sugumar
Learning Disability Practice
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Service users’ experiences of the remote delivery of psychology assessments and interventions in the community

Ursula McCann, Birunthika Sugumar
article en

Abstract

This article details a service evaluation conducted in a community team for people with learning disabilities at one NHS trust in England to explore service users’ experiences of remote delivery of psychological input during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The team’s psychologists had provided assessments and interventions to service users via telephone or video calls. A retrospective survey was conducted to determine whether remote input was acceptable, effective and could remain an option for the future.Thirty three service users who had directly or indirectly received individual remote psychological input completed the survey, often with support from a carer. Most reported positive experiences, including in terms of privacy, feeling heard and using technology. However, most respondents expressed a preference for face-to-face sessions. The findings suggest that the remote delivery of psychological input can be a feasible and acceptable option for service users who have a learning disability, but that face-to-face appointments should remain the primary method of input offered.

Learning Disability Practice
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.