Comparison of Ventilatory Ratios Calculated Using Predicted Versus Actual Body Weight

Background: Ventilatory ratio (VR) is a surrogate marker of dead-space fraction that is increasingly used to assess ventilation impairment and predict clinical outcomes. However, the current VR equation uses on predicted body weight (PBW) to estimate reference minute ventilation, which may lead to an overestimation of dead-space fraction in patients with extreme body weights. We hypothesized that VR calculated using PBW and actual body weight (ABW) might differ in their ability to predict outcomes, particularly in obese patients. Methods: This retrospective study compared the discrimination capacity of PBW-estimated VR (pVR), ABW-estimated VR (aVR), and corrected minute ventilation (V E corr ) for a composite outcome of death or weaning failure at ICU discharge across three body weight categories: underweight, normal-to-overweight, and obese. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess the discrimination capacity of the study outcome. Results: A total of 4,015 subjects who received mechanical ventilation were included. The primary composite outcome events occurred in 40.6% of subjects, including a mortality rate of 29.1%. In underweight subjects, no significant differences in discrimination capacity were observed among pVR, aVR, and V E corr (AUROC, 0.599, 0.598, 0.595, P = .92). In normal-to-overweight subjects, aVR outperformed V E corr (AUROC, 0.582 vs 0.571, P = .02), while pVR did not (AUROC, 0.576 vs 0.571, P = .39). In obese subjects, both aVR and V E corr outperformed pVR (AUROC 0.559 vs 0.520, P = .003; and AUROC 0.557 vs 0.520, P = .041). Conclusions: In nonobese subjects, there was no significant difference between using PBW and ABW to calculate VR for outcome prediction. However, in obese subjects, using ABW was associated with better predictive validity than using PBW. These findings suggest that PBW-based VR may be less reliable than ABW-based VR for assessing ventilation impairment in patients with higher body weight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654251405268
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Ventilatory Ratios Calculated Using Predicted Versus Actual Body Weight

Kuei‐Pin Chung, Jerry Shu-Hung Kuo, Chien Jung-Yien, Sheng-Yuan Ruan et al.
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Comparison of Ventilatory Ratios Calculated Using Predicted Versus Actual Body Weight

Kuei‐Pin Chung, Jerry Shu-Hung Kuo, Chien Jung-Yien, Sheng-Yuan Ruan, Chun-Ta Huang, Chun-Kai Huang, Lu-Cheng Kuo, Yao-Wen Kuo, Ying-Chun Chien
article en

Abstract

Background: Ventilatory ratio (VR) is a surrogate marker of dead-space fraction that is increasingly used to assess ventilation impairment and predict clinical outcomes. However, the current VR equation uses on predicted body weight (PBW) to estimate reference minute ventilation, which may lead to an overestimation of dead-space fraction in patients with extreme body weights. We hypothesized that VR calculated using PBW and actual body weight (ABW) might differ in their ability to predict outcomes, particularly in obese patients. Methods: This retrospective study compared the discrimination capacity of PBW-estimated VR (pVR), ABW-estimated VR (aVR), and corrected minute ventilation (V E corr ) for a composite outcome of death or weaning failure at ICU discharge across three body weight categories: underweight, normal-to-overweight, and obese. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess the discrimination capacity of the study outcome. Results: A total of 4,015 subjects who received mechanical ventilation were included. The primary composite outcome events occurred in 40.6% of subjects, including a mortality rate of 29.1%. In underweight subjects, no significant differences in discrimination capacity were observed among pVR, aVR, and V E corr (AUROC, 0.599, 0.598, 0.595, P = .92). In normal-to-overweight subjects, aVR outperformed V E corr (AUROC, 0.582 vs 0.571, P = .02), while pVR did not (AUROC, 0.576 vs 0.571, P = .39). In obese subjects, both aVR and V E corr outperformed pVR (AUROC 0.559 vs 0.520, P = .003; and AUROC 0.557 vs 0.520, P = .041). Conclusions: In nonobese subjects, there was no significant difference between using PBW and ABW to calculate VR for outcome prediction. However, in obese subjects, using ABW was associated with better predictive validity than using PBW. These findings suggest that PBW-based VR may be less reliable than ABW-based VR for assessing ventilation impairment in patients with higher body weight.

Respiratory Care
National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Chung Hua University (TW), National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (TW)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.