Liver transplantation in unresectable colorectal liver metastases–Defining the optimal candidate

Approximately half of all patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases over the course of their disease. While 20-30% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are potential candidates for curative hepatic resection, those with unresectable CRLM (uCRLM) have historically been limited to systemic chemotherapy or best supportive care. Recent evidence from the randomized controlled TransMet trial has demonstrated that orthotopic liver transplantation in carefully selected patients with uCRLM results in an 8-fold higher 5-year survival compared with chemotherapy only (73% versus 9%). When patient selection is further refined using tumor biology characteristics and response to chemotherapy as key selection criteria, encouraging 5-year survival rates ranging from 50-83% after LT have been reported. Although post-transplant tumor recurrence remains a major clinical concern, recurrent disease most commonly manifests as pulmonary metastases are frequently amenable to effective local or systemic treatment. Growing clinical evidence indicates that LT for uCRLM is emerging as a viable therapeutic strategy for highly selected patients lacking otherwise curative options. Nevertheless, the field urgently requires standardized selection protocols and clear guidance on how such transplant candidates should be prioritized within national organ allocation systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation Reports
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpr.2026.100196
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liver transplantation in unresectable colorectal liver metastases–Defining the optimal candidate

Ralph Fritsch, Visnuka Sivasubramaniam, José Oberholzer, Henrik Petrowsky et al.
Transplantation Reports
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Liver transplantation in unresectable colorectal liver metastases–Defining the optimal candidate

Ralph Fritsch, Visnuka Sivasubramaniam, José Oberholzer, Henrik Petrowsky, Yi Ping Sng, Christoph Eckharter, Andreas Emanuel Kremer, Pascale Tinguely, Richard Xavier Sousa Da Silva
article en

Abstract

Approximately half of all patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases over the course of their disease. While 20-30% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are potential candidates for curative hepatic resection, those with unresectable CRLM (uCRLM) have historically been limited to systemic chemotherapy or best supportive care. Recent evidence from the randomized controlled TransMet trial has demonstrated that orthotopic liver transplantation in carefully selected patients with uCRLM results in an 8-fold higher 5-year survival compared with chemotherapy only (73% versus 9%). When patient selection is further refined using tumor biology characteristics and response to chemotherapy as key selection criteria, encouraging 5-year survival rates ranging from 50-83% after LT have been reported. Although post-transplant tumor recurrence remains a major clinical concern, recurrent disease most commonly manifests as pulmonary metastases are frequently amenable to effective local or systemic treatment. Growing clinical evidence indicates that LT for uCRLM is emerging as a viable therapeutic strategy for highly selected patients lacking otherwise curative options. Nevertheless, the field urgently requires standardized selection protocols and clear guidance on how such transplant candidates should be prioritized within national organ allocation systems.

Transplantation ReportsVol. 11(2)
University of Zurich (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.