Long-term wrist procedures: Refining evidence for durability and patient-centred outcomes

Castro-Guerrero et al. review long-term outcomes after wrist procedures in adults, reporting moderate durability of contemporary wrist prostheses and heterogeneous reporting of patient-reported outcome measures. This letter places their findings within existing total wrist arthroplasty and rheumatoid arthritis literature, which similarly show a trade-off between motion preservation and higher complication rates. We then outline key limitations of the review, including clinical heterogeneity, limited subgroup analyses and inconsistent treatment of non-prosthetic interventions. Finally, we propose priorities for future research, emphasising diagnosis-stratified long-term cohorts, evaluation of personalised three-dimensional printed implants and pragmatic multi-centre trials using harmonised outcome metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Orthopaedics
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advop.2026.01.001
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term wrist procedures: Refining evidence for durability and patient-centred outcomes

Ankit Batra, Ankita Kalra, Jeffrin Reneus Paul, Naveen Kumar Sanku et al.
Advanced Orthopaedics
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Long-term wrist procedures: Refining evidence for durability and patient-centred outcomes

Ankit Batra, Ankita Kalra, Jeffrin Reneus Paul, Naveen Kumar Sanku, Janvi Patel
article en

Abstract

Castro-Guerrero et al. review long-term outcomes after wrist procedures in adults, reporting moderate durability of contemporary wrist prostheses and heterogeneous reporting of patient-reported outcome measures. This letter places their findings within existing total wrist arthroplasty and rheumatoid arthritis literature, which similarly show a trade-off between motion preservation and higher complication rates. We then outline key limitations of the review, including clinical heterogeneity, limited subgroup analyses and inconsistent treatment of non-prosthetic interventions. Finally, we propose priorities for future research, emphasising diagnosis-stratified long-term cohorts, evaluation of personalised three-dimensional printed implants and pragmatic multi-centre trials using harmonised outcome metrics.

Advanced OrthopaedicsVol. 3
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre (IN), Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN), Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (India) (IN), Graphic Era University (IN), Sharda University (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.