Early Eastern Indo‐Aryan Case: Evidence From the <i>Caryāpada</i> <sup>1</sup>

Abstract The history of the case systems of the Eastern Indo‐Aryan languages is characterised by the radical reduction of the set of inherited nominal morphology, leaving only a generic oblique marker in the modern languages. At the same time, the case systems of these languages have been expanded through univerbation of postpositions, typically including a genitive, locative and a dative‐accusative. However, the interaction of these two groups is not straightforward and key questions remain unanswered by existing sources on the topic such as Chatterji (1926; The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language ). This article analyses the Caryāpada corpus, an invaluable record of an early stage of the Eastern Indo‐Aryan languages, in order to resolve some of these issues. It is shown that at this stage the language had already largely transitioned towards the system seen in the modern languages. At the same time some conservative features remain, including agreement for gender and case on the innovative genitive suffix as well as a wide array of usages for the inherited oblique which the modern languages individually reflect only in part. This article contributes to discussions around the development of case paradigms, particularly the complex interactions that come into play between existing forms and innovative forms coalescing into a single system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Philological Society
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.70023
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Eastern Indo‐Aryan Case: Evidence From the Caryāpada 1

John Hutchinson
Transactions of the Philological Society
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Early Eastern Indo‐Aryan Case: Evidence From the Caryāpada 1

John Hutchinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The history of the case systems of the Eastern Indo‐Aryan languages is characterised by the radical reduction of the set of inherited nominal morphology, leaving only a generic oblique marker in the modern languages. At the same time, the case systems of these languages have been expanded through univerbation of postpositions, typically including a genitive, locative and a dative‐accusative. However, the interaction of these two groups is not straightforward and key questions remain unanswered by existing sources on the topic such as Chatterji (1926; The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language ). This article analyses the Caryāpada corpus, an invaluable record of an early stage of the Eastern Indo‐Aryan languages, in order to resolve some of these issues. It is shown that at this stage the language had already largely transitioned towards the system seen in the modern languages. At the same time some conservative features remain, including agreement for gender and case on the innovative genitive suffix as well as a wide array of usages for the inherited oblique which the modern languages individually reflect only in part. This article contributes to discussions around the development of case paradigms, particularly the complex interactions that come into play between existing forms and innovative forms coalescing into a single system.

Transactions of the Philological Society
University of Surrey (GB)
University of Surrey
Gender equality, Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.