Impact of core strengthening on chronic mechanical low back pain: a clinical trial based on Saliba’s postural classification

Chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP) is frequently associated with abnormal spinal alignment. Core strengthening exercises are extensively used in therapy, however, results may differ depending on postural categorization. This study investigated the effects of core muscle exercises on pain, function, and trunk endurance in patients classified using Saliba’s postural classification system (SPCS). Sixty patients with CMLBP were assigned to one of six postural classification groups (I–VI) of SPCS (10 patients per group) based on photographic analysis and confirmatory clinical tests. For four weeks, abdominal bracing, dynamic stabilization, and advanced core strengthening exercises were performed. Pain intensity, functional disability, and core endurance were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), standardized endurance tests, respectively. Assessment was performed pre and post-intervention. A one-way MANOVA and follow up ANOVA tests revealed that there were non-significant differences on reducing pain and functional disability post treatment, F(5,54) = 0.72; P = 0.612; partial ƞ2 = 0.06, F(5,54) = 0.67; P = 0.652; partial ƞ2 = 0.06 for pain and functional disability, respectively. However, specific postural groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in trunk muscle endurance, particularly in right and left side plank performance, F(5,54) = 3.34; P = 0.011; partial ƞ2 = 0.24 and F(5,54) = 3.80; P = 0.005; partial ƞ2 = 0.26, respectively. A post hoc comparison for plank tests indicated that group I had significantly better right side plank endurance than group V and VI. Also, group I had significantly better left side plank endurance than group II, V and VI. Core muscle strengthening exercises (CMSE) improved trunk muscular endurance in different postural groups, although the reductions in pain and functional impairment were not statistically different. These data indicate that gains in endurance may not directly transfer to similar improvements in pain or function. The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration No: NCT06296667) on 5/3/2024. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethical Committee of Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt prior to study initiation (Approval No: P.T.REC/012/003644; Date: 27/2/2022).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09693-0
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of core strengthening on chronic mechanical low back pain: a clinical trial based on Saliba’s postural classification

Nasr Awad Abdelkader, Elsadat Saad Soliman, Mohamed Omar Soliman, Mohamed Ahmed Abdelmegeed et al.
European Spine Journal
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Impact of core strengthening on chronic mechanical low back pain: a clinical trial based on Saliba’s postural classification

Nasr Awad Abdelkader, Elsadat Saad Soliman, Mohamed Omar Soliman, Mohamed Ahmed Abdelmegeed, Rania Saleh Elemam
article en

Abstract

Chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP) is frequently associated with abnormal spinal alignment. Core strengthening exercises are extensively used in therapy, however, results may differ depending on postural categorization. This study investigated the effects of core muscle exercises on pain, function, and trunk endurance in patients classified using Saliba’s postural classification system (SPCS). Sixty patients with CMLBP were assigned to one of six postural classification groups (I–VI) of SPCS (10 patients per group) based on photographic analysis and confirmatory clinical tests. For four weeks, abdominal bracing, dynamic stabilization, and advanced core strengthening exercises were performed. Pain intensity, functional disability, and core endurance were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), standardized endurance tests, respectively. Assessment was performed pre and post-intervention. A one-way MANOVA and follow up ANOVA tests revealed that there were non-significant differences on reducing pain and functional disability post treatment, F(5,54) = 0.72; P = 0.612; partial ƞ2 = 0.06, F(5,54) = 0.67; P = 0.652; partial ƞ2 = 0.06 for pain and functional disability, respectively. However, specific postural groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in trunk muscle endurance, particularly in right and left side plank performance, F(5,54) = 3.34; P = 0.011; partial ƞ2 = 0.24 and F(5,54) = 3.80; P = 0.005; partial ƞ2 = 0.26, respectively. A post hoc comparison for plank tests indicated that group I had significantly better right side plank endurance than group V and VI. Also, group I had significantly better left side plank endurance than group II, V and VI. Core muscle strengthening exercises (CMSE) improved trunk muscular endurance in different postural groups, although the reductions in pain and functional impairment were not statistically different. These data indicate that gains in endurance may not directly transfer to similar improvements in pain or function. The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration No: NCT06296667) on 5/3/2024. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethical Committee of Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt prior to study initiation (Approval No: P.T.REC/012/003644; Date: 27/2/2022).

European Spine Journal
Kafrelsheikh University (EG), Hofstra University (US), Cairo University (EG), University of Health and Allied Sciences (GH), Port Said University (EG)
Cairo University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.