Quantifying the compressibility of the human brain

In the human brain, the allowed patterns of activity are constrained by the correlations between brain regions. Yet it remains unclear which correlations-and how many-are needed to predict large-scale neural activity. Here, we present an information-theoretic framework to identify the most important correlations, which provide the most accurate predictions of neural states. Applying our framework to cortical activity in humans, we find that the vast majority of variance in activity is explained by a small number of correlations. This means that the brain is highly compressible: Only a sparse network of correlations is needed to predict large-scale activity. We find that this compressibility is strikingly consistent across different individuals and cognitive tasks and that, counterintuitively, the most important correlations are not necessarily the strongest. Together, these results suggest that nearly all correlations are not needed to predict neural activity, and we provide the tools to uncover the key correlations that are.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2531115123
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the compressibility of the human brain

J. Faskowitz, Christopher W. Lynn, Richard F Betzel, Nicholas J Weaver
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
29.71
article

Quantifying the compressibility of the human brain

J. Faskowitz, Christopher W. Lynn, Richard F Betzel, Nicholas J Weaver
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the human brain, the allowed patterns of activity are constrained by the correlations between brain regions. Yet it remains unclear which correlations-and how many-are needed to predict large-scale neural activity. Here, we present an information-theoretic framework to identify the most important correlations, which provide the most accurate predictions of neural states. Applying our framework to cortical activity in humans, we find that the vast majority of variance in activity is explained by a small number of correlations. This means that the brain is highly compressible: Only a sparse network of correlations is needed to predict large-scale activity. We find that this compressibility is strikingly consistent across different individuals and cognitive tasks and that, counterintuitively, the most important correlations are not necessarily the strongest. Together, these results suggest that nearly all correlations are not needed to predict neural activity, and we provide the tools to uncover the key correlations that are.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(4)
Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Yale University (US), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Physical Sciences (United States) (US), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
29.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.