KEY ASPECTS OF GRI AND SASB IN SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

In the context of globalization and increased attention to environmental, social and governance aspects of organizations, the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) and SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board) reporting standards represent two leading approaches aimed at improving transparency in the field of sustainable development. The article presents an analytical study aimed at conducting a comparative analysis of both standards, identifying their features, principles and practical application. Based on a review of scientific literature and comparative analysis, the authors examine how these standards differ in the context of goals, structure, and how they address financial and non-financial aspects of sustainable development. The study emphasizes that the choice between GRI and SASB or their combined use should be based on the strategic goals of the organization and the needs of stakeholders to achieve a high level of reporting and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Management
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29039/2500-1469-2025-13-9-160-167
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agricultural and Financial Auditing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KEY ASPECTS OF GRI AND SASB IN SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

O. A. Petrova
3 citations
Russian Journal of Management
Agricultural and Financial Auditing
14.50
article

KEY ASPECTS OF GRI AND SASB IN SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

O. A. Petrova
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In the context of globalization and increased attention to environmental, social and governance aspects of organizations, the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) and SASB (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board) reporting standards represent two leading approaches aimed at improving transparency in the field of sustainable development. The article presents an analytical study aimed at conducting a comparative analysis of both standards, identifying their features, principles and practical application. Based on a review of scientific literature and comparative analysis, the authors examine how these standards differ in the context of goals, structure, and how they address financial and non-financial aspects of sustainable development. The study emphasizes that the choice between GRI and SASB or their combined use should be based on the strategic goals of the organization and the needs of stakeholders to achieve a high level of reporting and sustainable development.

Russian Journal of ManagementVol. 13(9)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agricultural and Financial Auditing
14.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.