Of Carcasses and Christ: Rereading the Repugnant Ecological Other

ABSTRACT This essay claims that a collection of hunting and fishing devotionals provincializes a common trope in environmental literatures: the figure of the repugnantly anti‐ecological conservative Protestant. A close reading of these texts reveals their authors’ and ideal audiences’ extensive knowledge of land and animal minds, which deflates their construal as unconcerned with or antipathic toward the nonhuman. Moreover, these texts are works of practical ethics that conceive of hunting as a norm‐constituted activity involving complex forms of valuing nonhuman animals. These values come out in how the authors describe risking human relations and submitting their bodies to the elements to do right by animals. The authors also express their multispecies axiology through curious arts of tying the slaying and field‐dressing of game to the crucifixion. I suggest that these features should evoke for progressive environmentalists a sense of the uncanny.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Religious Ethics
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.70014
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Of Carcasses and Christ: Rereading the Repugnant Ecological Other

Colin B. Weaver
Journal of Religious Ethics
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Of Carcasses and Christ: Rereading the Repugnant Ecological Other

Colin B. Weaver
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay claims that a collection of hunting and fishing devotionals provincializes a common trope in environmental literatures: the figure of the repugnantly anti‐ecological conservative Protestant. A close reading of these texts reveals their authors’ and ideal audiences’ extensive knowledge of land and animal minds, which deflates their construal as unconcerned with or antipathic toward the nonhuman. Moreover, these texts are works of practical ethics that conceive of hunting as a norm‐constituted activity involving complex forms of valuing nonhuman animals. These values come out in how the authors describe risking human relations and submitting their bodies to the elements to do right by animals. The authors also express their multispecies axiology through curious arts of tying the slaying and field‐dressing of game to the crucifixion. I suggest that these features should evoke for progressive environmentalists a sense of the uncanny.

Journal of Religious Ethics
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.