IoMT–Fog–Cloud-based AI frameworks for chronic disease diagnosis: updated comparative analysis with recent AI-IoMT models (2020–2025)

Chronic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease require frequent monitoring and timely clinical feedback to prevent complications. Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) systems increasingly combine near-patient sensing with Fog and Cloud computing so that time-critical preprocessing and inference can run close to the patient while compute-intensive training and population-level analytics remain in the Cloud. This review synthesizes primary studies published between 2020 and 2025 that implement AI-enabled IoMT, with an emphasis on systems that report both diagnostic performance and network quality-of-service (QoS). Following PRISMA 2020, we screened database records and included 14 primary studies; we focus the joint performance-QoS synthesis on six IoMT-Fog-Cloud frameworks for diabetes and cardiovascular disease and compare them with two recent multi-disease AI-IoMT models (DACL and TasLA). Diabetes-oriented implementations commonly report accuracy around 95%-96% using explainable or ensemble deep learning, whereas some cardiovascular frameworks report >99% accuracy in controlled settings; we therefore discuss plausible sources of optimistic performance, including small datasets, class imbalance, curated benchmarks, and potential leakage/overfitting in simulation-based evaluations. Across IoMT-Fog-Cloud studies, placing preprocessing and/or inference at the Fog layer repeatedly reduces end-to-end latency for streaming biosignals, but multi-Fog provisioning can increase energy and power demands. To support more reproducible comparisons, we organize 14 extracted metrics into (i) diagnostic performance (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity) and (ii) system/network QoS (latency, jitter, throughput, bandwidth utilization, processing/execution time, network usage, energy consumption, power consumption), and we translate the evidence into study-linked design recommendations for future deployments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medical Technology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2026.1748964
Primary Topic
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IoMT–Fog–Cloud-based AI frameworks for chronic disease diagnosis: updated comparative analysis with recent AI-IoMT models (2020–2025)

Kitsakorn Locharoenrat
Frontiers in Medical Technology
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
article

IoMT–Fog–Cloud-based AI frameworks for chronic disease diagnosis: updated comparative analysis with recent AI-IoMT models (2020–2025)

Kitsakorn Locharoenrat
article en

Abstract

Chronic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease require frequent monitoring and timely clinical feedback to prevent complications. Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) systems increasingly combine near-patient sensing with Fog and Cloud computing so that time-critical preprocessing and inference can run close to the patient while compute-intensive training and population-level analytics remain in the Cloud. This review synthesizes primary studies published between 2020 and 2025 that implement AI-enabled IoMT, with an emphasis on systems that report both diagnostic performance and network quality-of-service (QoS). Following PRISMA 2020, we screened database records and included 14 primary studies; we focus the joint performance-QoS synthesis on six IoMT-Fog-Cloud frameworks for diabetes and cardiovascular disease and compare them with two recent multi-disease AI-IoMT models (DACL and TasLA). Diabetes-oriented implementations commonly report accuracy around 95%-96% using explainable or ensemble deep learning, whereas some cardiovascular frameworks report >99% accuracy in controlled settings; we therefore discuss plausible sources of optimistic performance, including small datasets, class imbalance, curated benchmarks, and potential leakage/overfitting in simulation-based evaluations. Across IoMT-Fog-Cloud studies, placing preprocessing and/or inference at the Fog layer repeatedly reduces end-to-end latency for streaming biosignals, but multi-Fog provisioning can increase energy and power demands. To support more reproducible comparisons, we organize 14 extracted metrics into (i) diagnostic performance (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity) and (ii) system/network QoS (latency, jitter, throughput, bandwidth utilization, processing/execution time, network usage, energy consumption, power consumption), and we translate the evidence into study-linked design recommendations for future deployments.

Frontiers in Medical TechnologyVol. 8
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (TH)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

IoMT–Fog–Cloud-based AI frameworks for chronic disease diagnosis: updated comparative analysis with recent AI-IoMT models (2020–2025) — Kitsakorn Locharoenrat · Frontiers in Medical Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS