Ontological Insecurity in the Asia-Pacific

Asia-Pacific states are navigating significant geoeconomic and geopolitical transformations amid an increasingly multipolar international system, characterized by diverse and alternative modernities. These global and regional shifts generate instability, unpredictability, and geopolitical anxiety, fostering heightened ontological insecurity. This article engages with key debates in ontological security studies, including the relationship between ontological security and the continuity or change of routines and narratives, the triggers of insecurity from significant others and disruptive events, and the need for adaptation to new environments. By addressing these issues, we expand the research program of ontological security studies and open new avenues for theoretical inquiry. We argue that ontological security should be understood as complementary to, rather than a substitute for, rational choice approaches. This perspective emphasizes the interplay between physical and ontological security, highlighting their complementarity as a crucial focus for future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Published
2025-12-25
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ontological Insecurity in the Asia-Pacific

Ferran Perez Mena, Ivan Gonzalez Pujol
Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Global Security and Public Health
article

Ontological Insecurity in the Asia-Pacific

Ferran Perez Mena, Ivan Gonzalez Pujol
article en

Abstract

Asia-Pacific states are navigating significant geoeconomic and geopolitical transformations amid an increasingly multipolar international system, characterized by diverse and alternative modernities. These global and regional shifts generate instability, unpredictability, and geopolitical anxiety, fostering heightened ontological insecurity. This article engages with key debates in ontological security studies, including the relationship between ontological security and the continuity or change of routines and narratives, the triggers of insecurity from significant others and disruptive events, and the need for adaptation to new environments. By addressing these issues, we expand the research program of ontological security studies and open new avenues for theoretical inquiry. We argue that ontological security should be understood as complementary to, rather than a substitute for, rational choice approaches. This perspective emphasizes the interplay between physical and ontological security, highlighting their complementarity as a crucial focus for future research.

Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ontological Insecurity in the Asia-Pacific — Ferran Perez Mena, Ivan Gonzalez Pujol · Durham Research Online (Durham University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS