Prognostic role of bone erosion in orbital RMS: a report from the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

Background: Orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is often limited to the orbital cavity and has a favorable prognosis. In some cases, the tumor can erode the orbital bone and behave as a parameningeal RMS (PM-RMS); thus, it is treated more intensively. However, the current protocols do not provide any guidance on how to consider different grades of bone erosion (BE) that can vary widely, hampering a uniform classification and the subsequent treatment assignment. With the aim of clarifying the role of BE as a risk factor, we analyzed patients with orbital RMS included in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) protocol. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the radiological reports of 199 patients with orbital RMS (PM or not) and defined three grades of BE: minimal (thinning of the bone), moderate (focal bone lysis), and extensive (complete cortical destruction). Results: BE was present in 55 of the 199 (27.6%) patients, which was classified as minimal in 27, moderate in 7, and extensive in 21. Tumors with extensive BE were more frequently large (>5 cm, p = 0.0008) and invasive (T2, p = 0.001). With a median follow-up of 70.4 months (range = 7.1–167.7), a total of 183 patients are alive, with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 76% (95%CI = 69.2–81.3) and 92% (95%CI = 86.7–94.8), respectively. Patients without any BE had better OS (95% vs. 81%, p = 0.001), but not EFS. Patients with no/minimal/moderate BE had better EFS and OS compared with patients with extensive BE [EFS of 78.1 (95%CI = 71.1–83.5) vs. 57.1 (95%CI = 33.8–74.9), p = 0.0114, respectively, and OS of 94.0 (95%CI = 89.2–96.8) vs. 71.1 (95%CI = 46.6–85.9), p < 0.0001, respectively]. Events and metastatic relapses (in all cases CNS/meningeal) were more frequent in patients with extensive BE. Conclusions: Only those patients with orbital RMS and extensive BE should be considered as PM and should be treated accordingly.

Publication Details

Journal
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Published
2024-12-12
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic role of bone erosion in orbital RMS: a report from the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prognostic role of bone erosion in orbital RMS: a report from the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

article en

Abstract

Background: Orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is often limited to the orbital cavity and has a favorable prognosis. In some cases, the tumor can erode the orbital bone and behave as a parameningeal RMS (PM-RMS); thus, it is treated more intensively. However, the current protocols do not provide any guidance on how to consider different grades of bone erosion (BE) that can vary widely, hampering a uniform classification and the subsequent treatment assignment. With the aim of clarifying the role of BE as a risk factor, we analyzed patients with orbital RMS included in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) protocol. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the radiological reports of 199 patients with orbital RMS (PM or not) and defined three grades of BE: minimal (thinning of the bone), moderate (focal bone lysis), and extensive (complete cortical destruction). Results: BE was present in 55 of the 199 (27.6%) patients, which was classified as minimal in 27, moderate in 7, and extensive in 21. Tumors with extensive BE were more frequently large (>5 cm, p = 0.0008) and invasive (T2, p = 0.001). With a median follow-up of 70.4 months (range = 7.1–167.7), a total of 183 patients are alive, with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 76% (95%CI = 69.2–81.3) and 92% (95%CI = 86.7–94.8), respectively. Patients without any BE had better OS (95% vs. 81%, p = 0.001), but not EFS. Patients with no/minimal/moderate BE had better EFS and OS compared with patients with extensive BE [EFS of 78.1 (95%CI = 71.1–83.5) vs. 57.1 (95%CI = 33.8–74.9), p = 0.0114, respectively, and OS of 94.0 (95%CI = 89.2–96.8) vs. 71.1 (95%CI = 46.6–85.9), p < 0.0001, respectively]. Events and metastatic relapses (in all cases CNS/meningeal) were more frequent in patients with extensive BE. Conclusions: Only those patients with orbital RMS and extensive BE should be considered as PM and should be treated accordingly.

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prognostic role of bone erosion in orbital RMS: a report from the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS