Theoretical and methodological issues in the identification of metaphorical language

Abstract The study provides a critical overview of metaphor identification methodologies and suggests further improvements to one of the most common procedures known as MIPVU. It presents the theoretical background to two major tasks of metaphor identification: the segmentation of text into linguistic units and determining their metaphoricity. The latter includes the demarcation of senses and the specification of source and target domain meanings. Difficulties involved in annotation include the establishment of boundaries to delimit metaphorical meaning-carrying elements, metaphoricity associated with word sequences rather than individual lexis, the treatment of compounds, particles and nominal inflections, as well as conflating or overlapping sense descriptions in the dictionary. Many of these issues are illustrated with a detailed analysis of Hungarian examples. A flexible but principled application of the procedure is recommended depending on the specific research agenda. The study advocates the utilization of the notion of decomposability in determining the metaphorical status of idiom-internal words and suggests a modification in MIPVU’s treatment of compounds. Decisions taken early in the process of metaphor analysis have repercussions in later stages when source domains and mappings are identified or quantitative analysis is conducted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00251.cse
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical and methodological issues in the identification of metaphorical language

Attila Cserép
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Theoretical and methodological issues in the identification of metaphorical language

Attila Cserép
article en

Abstract

Abstract The study provides a critical overview of metaphor identification methodologies and suggests further improvements to one of the most common procedures known as MIPVU. It presents the theoretical background to two major tasks of metaphor identification: the segmentation of text into linguistic units and determining their metaphoricity. The latter includes the demarcation of senses and the specification of source and target domain meanings. Difficulties involved in annotation include the establishment of boundaries to delimit metaphorical meaning-carrying elements, metaphoricity associated with word sequences rather than individual lexis, the treatment of compounds, particles and nominal inflections, as well as conflating or overlapping sense descriptions in the dictionary. Many of these issues are illustrated with a detailed analysis of Hungarian examples. A flexible but principled application of the procedure is recommended depending on the specific research agenda. The study advocates the utilization of the notion of decomposability in determining the metaphorical status of idiom-internal words and suggests a modification in MIPVU’s treatment of compounds. Decisions taken early in the process of metaphor analysis have repercussions in later stages when source domains and mappings are identified or quantitative analysis is conducted.

Review of Cognitive Linguistics
University of Debrecen (HU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Theoretical and methodological issues in the identification of metaphorical language — Attila Cserép · Review of Cognitive Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS