Comprehensive study of WIMP models explaining the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:math> -LAT Galactic Cent

The Galactic Center excess (GCE) of GeV <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>γ</a:mi> </a:math> rays may hint at dark matter (DM), yet its origin remains debated. Motivated by this, we survey weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) models that can fit the GCE while satisfying relic-density, direct-detection (DD), and indirect-detection (ID) bounds. We group candidates into (Higgs portals; simplified scalar/vector mediators), [ <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>U</c:mi> <c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo> <c:mn>1</c:mn> <c:msub> <c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo> <c:mrow> <c:msub> <c:mi>L</c:mi> <c:mi>i</c:mi> </c:msub> <c:mo>−</c:mo> <c:msub> <c:mi>L</c:mi> <c:mi>j</c:mi> </c:msub> </c:mrow> </c:msub> </c:math> ], and [ <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi>U</g:mi> <g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo> <g:mn>1</g:mn> <g:msub> <g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo> <g:mrow> <g:mi>B</g:mi> <g:mo>−</g:mo> <g:mi>L</g:mi> </g:mrow> </g:msub> </g:math> , <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi>Z</k:mi> </k:math> -portal] classes. Across all cases, present DD and dwarf-spheroidal <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mi>γ</m:mi> </m:math> -ray limits exclude wide regions, leaving mainly narrow with <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msub> <o:mi>m</o:mi> <o:mrow> <o:mi>DM</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:msub> <o:mo>≃</o:mo> <o:msub> <o:mi>m</o:mi> <o:mrow> <o:mi>med</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:msub> <o:mo>/</o:mo> <o:mn>2</o:mn> </o:math> and portal couplings <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:mo>≪</q:mo> <q:mn>1</q:mn> </q:math> . In hadronic setups, scalar and vector Higgs portals survive only in a thin strip near <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <s:msub> <s:mi>m</s:mi> <s:mi>h</s:mi> </s:msub> <s:mo>/</s:mo> <s:mn>2</s:mn> <s:mo>≃</s:mo> <s:mn>62.5</s:mn> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mi>GeV</s:mi> </s:math> with portal couplings <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <u:mo>∼</u:mo> <u:msup> <u:mn>10</u:mn> <u:mrow> <u:mo>−</u:mo> <u:mn>4</u:mn> </u:mrow> </u:msup> </u:math> , while the Dirac Higgs and <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <w:mi>Z</w:mi> </w:math> portals are essentially excluded. The UV-complete vector Higgs portal retains resonant bands whose viable portal strength depends on the mixing angle. Simplified scalars allow small windows for complex-scalar or vector DM; Dirac DM is strongly disfavored, whereas a pseudoscalar with Dirac DM remains viable over a broader parameter range. For a simplified <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <y:msup> <y:mi>Z</y:mi> <y:mo>′</y:mo> </y:msup> </y:math> mediator, a pure vector coupling leaves only a marginal region, while pure axial is excluded by DD/ID bounds. In leptonic scenarios, inverse-Compton emission is essential: <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ab:msub> <ab:mi>L</ab:mi> <ab:mi>μ</ab:mi> </ab:msub> <ab:mo>−</ab:mo> <ab:msub> <ab:mi>L</ab:mi> <ab:mi>e</ab:mi> </ab:msub> </ab:math> (and, to a lesser extent, <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <cb:mi>B</cb:mi> <cb:mo>−</cb:mo> <cb:mi>L</cb:mi> </cb:math> ) fits the GCE with near-thermal cross sections, while <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <eb:msub> <eb:mi>L</eb:mi> <eb:mi>μ</eb:mi> </eb:msub> <eb:mo>−</eb:mo> <eb:msub> <eb:mi>L</eb:mi> <eb:mi>τ</eb:mi> </eb:msub> </eb:math> is disfavored. Overall, viable WIMP explanations are , with leptophilic vectors and pseudoscalar portals emerging as the most robust options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/v9vr-9skd
Primary Topic
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive study of WIMP models explaining the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:math> -LAT Galactic Cent

Anonymous
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
article

Comprehensive study of WIMP models explaining the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:math> -LAT Galactic Cent

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

The Galactic Center excess (GCE) of GeV <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>γ</a:mi> </a:math> rays may hint at dark matter (DM), yet its origin remains debated. Motivated by this, we survey weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) models that can fit the GCE while satisfying relic-density, direct-detection (DD), and indirect-detection (ID) bounds. We group candidates into (Higgs portals; simplified scalar/vector mediators), [ <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>U</c:mi> <c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo> <c:mn>1</c:mn> <c:msub> <c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo> <c:mrow> <c:msub> <c:mi>L</c:mi> <c:mi>i</c:mi> </c:msub> <c:mo>−</c:mo> <c:msub> <c:mi>L</c:mi> <c:mi>j</c:mi> </c:msub> </c:mrow> </c:msub> </c:math> ], and [ <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi>U</g:mi> <g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo> <g:mn>1</g:mn> <g:msub> <g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo> <g:mrow> <g:mi>B</g:mi> <g:mo>−</g:mo> <g:mi>L</g:mi> </g:mrow> </g:msub> </g:math> , <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi>Z</k:mi> </k:math> -portal] classes. Across all cases, present DD and dwarf-spheroidal <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mi>γ</m:mi> </m:math> -ray limits exclude wide regions, leaving mainly narrow with <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msub> <o:mi>m</o:mi> <o:mrow> <o:mi>DM</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:msub> <o:mo>≃</o:mo> <o:msub> <o:mi>m</o:mi> <o:mrow> <o:mi>med</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:msub> <o:mo>/</o:mo> <o:mn>2</o:mn> </o:math> and portal couplings <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:mo>≪</q:mo> <q:mn>1</q:mn> </q:math> . In hadronic setups, scalar and vector Higgs portals survive only in a thin strip near <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <s:msub> <s:mi>m</s:mi> <s:mi>h</s:mi> </s:msub> <s:mo>/</s:mo> <s:mn>2</s:mn> <s:mo>≃</s:mo> <s:mn>62.5</s:mn> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mi>GeV</s:mi> </s:math> with portal couplings <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <u:mo>∼</u:mo> <u:msup> <u:mn>10</u:mn> <u:mrow> <u:mo>−</u:mo> <u:mn>4</u:mn> </u:mrow> </u:msup> </u:math> , while the Dirac Higgs and <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <w:mi>Z</w:mi> </w:math> portals are essentially excluded. The UV-complete vector Higgs portal retains resonant bands whose viable portal strength depends on the mixing angle. Simplified scalars allow small windows for complex-scalar or vector DM; Dirac DM is strongly disfavored, whereas a pseudoscalar with Dirac DM remains viable over a broader parameter range. For a simplified <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <y:msup> <y:mi>Z</y:mi> <y:mo>′</y:mo> </y:msup> </y:math> mediator, a pure vector coupling leaves only a marginal region, while pure axial is excluded by DD/ID bounds. In leptonic scenarios, inverse-Compton emission is essential: <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ab:msub> <ab:mi>L</ab:mi> <ab:mi>μ</ab:mi> </ab:msub> <ab:mo>−</ab:mo> <ab:msub> <ab:mi>L</ab:mi> <ab:mi>e</ab:mi> </ab:msub> </ab:math> (and, to a lesser extent, <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <cb:mi>B</cb:mi> <cb:mo>−</cb:mo> <cb:mi>L</cb:mi> </cb:math> ) fits the GCE with near-thermal cross sections, while <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <eb:msub> <eb:mi>L</eb:mi> <eb:mi>μ</eb:mi> </eb:msub> <eb:mo>−</eb:mo> <eb:msub> <eb:mi>L</eb:mi> <eb:mi>τ</eb:mi> </eb:msub> </eb:math> is disfavored. Overall, viable WIMP explanations are , with leptophilic vectors and pseudoscalar portals emerging as the most robust options.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(4)
John Brown University (US), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.