Design and Material Characterisation of Additively Manufactured Polymer Scaffolds for Medical Devices

Additive manufacturing has been adopted in several industries including the medical field to develop new personalised medical implants including tissue engineering scaffolds. Custom patient-specific scaffolds can be additively manufactured to speed up the wound healing process. The aim of this study was to design, fabricate, and evaluate a range of materials and scaffold architectures for 3D-printed wound dressings intended for soft tissue applications, such as skin repair. Multiple biocompatible polymers, including polylactic acid (PLA), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), butenediol vinyl alcohol copolymer (BVOH), and polycaprolactone (PCL), were fabricated using a material extrusion additive manufacturing technique. Eight scaffolds, five with circular designs (knee meniscus angled (KMA), knee meniscus stacked (KMS), circle dense centre (CDC), circle dense edge (CDE), and circle no gradient (CNG)), and three square scaffolds (square dense centre (SDC), square dense edge (SDE), and square no gradient (SNG), with varying pore widths and gradient distributions) were designed using an open-source custom toolpath generator to enable precise control over scaffold architecture. An in vitro degradation study in phosphate-buffered saline demonstrated that PLA exhibited the greatest material stability, indicating minimal degradation under the tested conditions. In comparison, PVA showed improved performance relative to BVOH, as it was capable of absorbing a greater volume of exudate fluid and remained structurally intact for a longer duration, requiring up to 60 min to fully dissolve. Tensile testing of PLA scaffolds further revealed that designs with increased porosity towards the centre exhibited superior mechanical performance. The strongest scaffold design exhibited a Young’s modulus of 1060.67 ± 16.22 MPa and withstood a maximum tensile stress of 21.89 ± 0.81 MPa before fracture, while maintaining a porosity of approximately 52.37%. This demonstrates a favourable balance between mechanical strength and porosity that mimics key properties of engineered tissues such as the meniscus. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of 3D-printed, patient-specific scaffolds to enhance the effectiveness and customisation of tissue engineering treatments, such as meniscus repair, offering a promising approach for next-generation regenerative applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10010039
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design and Material Characterisation of Additively Manufactured Polymer Scaffolds for Medical Devices

Martin J. Taylor, Heba Ghazal, Amirpasha Moetazedian, Aidan Pereira et al.
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Design and Material Characterisation of Additively Manufactured Polymer Scaffolds for Medical Devices

Martin J. Taylor, Heba Ghazal, Amirpasha Moetazedian, Aidan Pereira, Frances E. Longbottom, Bin Zhang, Jie Han
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has been adopted in several industries including the medical field to develop new personalised medical implants including tissue engineering scaffolds. Custom patient-specific scaffolds can be additively manufactured to speed up the wound healing process. The aim of this study was to design, fabricate, and evaluate a range of materials and scaffold architectures for 3D-printed wound dressings intended for soft tissue applications, such as skin repair. Multiple biocompatible polymers, including polylactic acid (PLA), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), butenediol vinyl alcohol copolymer (BVOH), and polycaprolactone (PCL), were fabricated using a material extrusion additive manufacturing technique. Eight scaffolds, five with circular designs (knee meniscus angled (KMA), knee meniscus stacked (KMS), circle dense centre (CDC), circle dense edge (CDE), and circle no gradient (CNG)), and three square scaffolds (square dense centre (SDC), square dense edge (SDE), and square no gradient (SNG), with varying pore widths and gradient distributions) were designed using an open-source custom toolpath generator to enable precise control over scaffold architecture. An in vitro degradation study in phosphate-buffered saline demonstrated that PLA exhibited the greatest material stability, indicating minimal degradation under the tested conditions. In comparison, PVA showed improved performance relative to BVOH, as it was capable of absorbing a greater volume of exudate fluid and remained structurally intact for a longer duration, requiring up to 60 min to fully dissolve. Tensile testing of PLA scaffolds further revealed that designs with increased porosity towards the centre exhibited superior mechanical performance. The strongest scaffold design exhibited a Young’s modulus of 1060.67 ± 16.22 MPa and withstood a maximum tensile stress of 21.89 ± 0.81 MPa before fracture, while maintaining a porosity of approximately 52.37%. This demonstrates a favourable balance between mechanical strength and porosity that mimics key properties of engineered tissues such as the meniscus. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of 3D-printed, patient-specific scaffolds to enhance the effectiveness and customisation of tissue engineering treatments, such as meniscus repair, offering a promising approach for next-generation regenerative applications.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 10(1)
University of London (GB), University of Hull (GB), Kingston University London (GB), Brunel University of London (GB)
Royal Society, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.