Translation, adaptation, and validation of a questionnaire: The methodological process exemplified by the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire

Introduction: Questionnaires represent an important methodological tool in research and clinical practice. When using a questionnaire in a new linguistic and cultural context, in addition to linguistic translation, it is necessary to conduct its adaptation and validation. The aim of this study was to present the general methodological process of translation, adaptation, and validation of a questionnaire, which was then illustrated through the example of the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire, developed to assess the reproductive health knowledge of women with systemic autoimmune diseases. Participants and Methods: The study was conducted at the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, from August 2023 to June 2025. In addition to the authors responsible for translation and adaptation, 30 physicians, 10 nurses/technicians, and 10 patients participated in validation of the questionnaire, while internal consistency was assessed on the responses of 100 patients. Results: The item content validity index (I-CVI) was high (0.90–1.00), with a scalelevel content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.98, and universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) of 0.80. Item clarity was also rated very highly (2.6–3.0 on a 1–3 scale). Comparison of the original and back-translated versions showed acceptable comparability of language (1.67–2.40; ref. <3) and similarity of interpretation (1.40–2.23; ref. <3) for all items. Construct validity was confirmed by differences in knowledge levels between patients and healthcare professionals (H(2)=14.376; p<0.001). The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.61, which, although relatively low, is comparable to the one from the original validation and acceptable given the limited number and heterogeneity of items. Conclusion: Following translation and cultural adaptation, the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire proved to be a valid and clearly understandable instrument for assessing reproductive health knowledge among target groups in the Croatian context, applicable in both research and daily clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Liječnički vjesnik
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26800/lv-147-11-12-3
Primary Topic
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, adaptation, and validation of a questionnaire: The methodological process exemplified by the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire

Lucija Šimunić
Liječnički vjesnik
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
article

Translation, adaptation, and validation of a questionnaire: The methodological process exemplified by the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire

Lucija Šimunić
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Questionnaires represent an important methodological tool in research and clinical practice. When using a questionnaire in a new linguistic and cultural context, in addition to linguistic translation, it is necessary to conduct its adaptation and validation. The aim of this study was to present the general methodological process of translation, adaptation, and validation of a questionnaire, which was then illustrated through the example of the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire, developed to assess the reproductive health knowledge of women with systemic autoimmune diseases. Participants and Methods: The study was conducted at the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, from August 2023 to June 2025. In addition to the authors responsible for translation and adaptation, 30 physicians, 10 nurses/technicians, and 10 patients participated in validation of the questionnaire, while internal consistency was assessed on the responses of 100 patients. Results: The item content validity index (I-CVI) was high (0.90–1.00), with a scalelevel content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.98, and universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) of 0.80. Item clarity was also rated very highly (2.6–3.0 on a 1–3 scale). Comparison of the original and back-translated versions showed acceptable comparability of language (1.67–2.40; ref. <3) and similarity of interpretation (1.40–2.23; ref. <3) for all items. Construct validity was confirmed by differences in knowledge levels between patients and healthcare professionals (H(2)=14.376; p<0.001). The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.61, which, although relatively low, is comparable to the one from the original validation and acceptable given the limited number and heterogeneity of items. Conclusion: Following translation and cultural adaptation, the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire proved to be a valid and clearly understandable instrument for assessing reproductive health knowledge among target groups in the Croatian context, applicable in both research and daily clinical practice.

Liječnički vjesnik
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Translation, adaptation, and validation of a questionnaire: The methodological process exemplified by the Croatian version of the ReproKnow questionnaire — Lucija Šimunić · Liječnički vjesnik (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS