Validating the Willing–Ready–Able (WRA) Framework to Measure Food Safety Engagement Among FSMA-Exempt Produce Growers in West Virginia

Building on an earlier pilot classification study, the present study uses a fully independent statewide sample to psychometrically validate the Willing-Ready-Able (WRA) framework and to test behavioral separation across readiness stages. Many small-scale produce farms in West Virginia are exempt from the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule (PSR), yet voluntary adoption of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) remains inconsistent due to the absence of a standardized engagement measure. The WRA framework is a behavioral readiness model that classifies FSMA-exempt growers by engagement in postharvest food safety practices. A statewide, cross-sectional survey was administered between July and August 2025 to FSMA-exempt produce growers recruited at farmers' markets across all six West Virginia Department of Agriculture regions. Of 130 growers approached, five declined to participate, yielding 125 completed responses (96% response rate). The questionnaire assessed three behavioral constructs-confidence, perceived importance, and willingness-toward seven GAP-aligned postharvest practices. Construct validity and internal consistency were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's α (0.81-0.88). All constructs showed strong reliability and clear single-factor solutions. Group-level differences across WRA classifications were tested using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), confirming significant overall effects (Wilks' Λ, p < 0.01). Univariate tests indicated significant differences for confidence (p < 0.01), willingness (p < 0.001), and importance (p < 0.001), with construct scores increasing stepwise across groups (Willing < Ready < Able). These findings validate WRA as a reliable diagnostic for assessing behavioral readiness among FSMA-exempt growers. The framework provides a practical mechanism for tailoring outreach strategies-building confidence among the Willing, reducing barriers for the Ready, and leveraging the Able as peer mentors-to strengthen voluntary food safety adoption and guide efficient resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Protection
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2026.100704
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating the Willing–Ready–Able (WRA) Framework to Measure Food Safety Engagement Among FSMA-Exempt Produce Growers in West Virginia

John N. Twist, Jessica M. Blythe, Cangliang Shen, Tim P Boltz et al.
Journal of Food Protection
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Validating the Willing–Ready–Able (WRA) Framework to Measure Food Safety Engagement Among FSMA-Exempt Produce Growers in West Virginia

John N. Twist, Jessica M. Blythe, Cangliang Shen, Tim P Boltz, Christopher M. Ashwell, Arron J. Giorgi, Jesica Temple, Ryan Hansen
article en

Abstract

Building on an earlier pilot classification study, the present study uses a fully independent statewide sample to psychometrically validate the Willing-Ready-Able (WRA) framework and to test behavioral separation across readiness stages. Many small-scale produce farms in West Virginia are exempt from the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule (PSR), yet voluntary adoption of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) remains inconsistent due to the absence of a standardized engagement measure. The WRA framework is a behavioral readiness model that classifies FSMA-exempt growers by engagement in postharvest food safety practices. A statewide, cross-sectional survey was administered between July and August 2025 to FSMA-exempt produce growers recruited at farmers' markets across all six West Virginia Department of Agriculture regions. Of 130 growers approached, five declined to participate, yielding 125 completed responses (96% response rate). The questionnaire assessed three behavioral constructs-confidence, perceived importance, and willingness-toward seven GAP-aligned postharvest practices. Construct validity and internal consistency were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's α (0.81-0.88). All constructs showed strong reliability and clear single-factor solutions. Group-level differences across WRA classifications were tested using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), confirming significant overall effects (Wilks' Λ, p < 0.01). Univariate tests indicated significant differences for confidence (p < 0.01), willingness (p < 0.001), and importance (p < 0.001), with construct scores increasing stepwise across groups (Willing < Ready < Able). These findings validate WRA as a reliable diagnostic for assessing behavioral readiness among FSMA-exempt growers. The framework provides a practical mechanism for tailoring outreach strategies-building confidence among the Willing, reducing barriers for the Ready, and leveraging the Able as peer mentors-to strengthen voluntary food safety adoption and guide efficient resource allocation.

Journal of Food ProtectionVol. 89(3)
West Virginia University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.