Comparative electromechanical performance of TPU/CB piezoresistive strain sensors fabricated from commercial conductive filaments

• Comparative evaluation of 3D-printed TPU/CB strain sensors fabricated from two commercial conductive filaments (RECREUS and FILI). • RECREUS sensors show higher ductility and negative piezoresistive response; FILI sensors exhibit positive, highly linear behavior at low strain. • TPU/CB/Ag FILI sensors demonstrate minimal baseline drift (<6%) after 500 cycles, confirming superior long-term durability. Commercially available conductive filaments offer a suitable option for rapidly fabricating piezoresistive strain sensors using additive manufacturing technologies. Extending previous work on the RECREUS-based sensors, this study presents a comparative evaluation of the electromechanical performance of strain sensors fabricated from two thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) filaments loaded with carbon black (CB): RECREUS and FILI. These filaments were processed via fused filament fabrication (FFF) to form TPU/CB sensors. To enhance electrical performance, silver interdigitated electrodes were integrated onto the sensor surfaces using direct ink writing (DIW), resulting in hybrid TPU/CB/Ag configurations. The sensors were characterized under quasi-static and dynamic tensile loading to assess their sensitivity, hysteresis, and durability. Sensors fabricated with RECREUS filament exhibited a negative piezoresistive response and high stretchability, with gauge factors ranging from approximately −18.61 to −0.29 for TPU/CB and from −23.78 to 0.45 for TPU/CB/Ag across the entire strain range. In contrast, FILI-based sensors showed a positive, highly linear response at low strain, with gauge factors of approximately 12–123 for TPU/CB and ≈16 for TPU/CB/Ag. The integration of silver electrodes improved electrical stability and reduced hysteresis in both sensor types. During cyclic loading with small strains between 0.2% and 5%, both materials generated an electrical response proportional to the deformation; however, only the FILI-based sensors kept a stable baseline with minimal drift. After 500 cycles, the FILI sensors showed less than 6% signal drift, compared with 27% drift observed in the RECREUS sensors. These findings highlight the influence of filler dispersion and electrode-to-polymer compatibility on sensor reliability and demonstrate that commercially available filaments with nominally similar compositions can exhibit significantly different electromechanical behavior, affecting sensor reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109221
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative electromechanical performance of TPU/CB piezoresistive strain sensors fabricated from commercial conductive filaments

Concepción A. Monje, Daniel Rodríguez, Claudia Sánchez, Susana Otero
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
21.28
article

Comparative electromechanical performance of TPU/CB piezoresistive strain sensors fabricated from commercial conductive filaments

Concepción A. Monje, Daniel Rodríguez, Claudia Sánchez, Susana Otero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Comparative evaluation of 3D-printed TPU/CB strain sensors fabricated from two commercial conductive filaments (RECREUS and FILI). • RECREUS sensors show higher ductility and negative piezoresistive response; FILI sensors exhibit positive, highly linear behavior at low strain. • TPU/CB/Ag FILI sensors demonstrate minimal baseline drift (<6%) after 500 cycles, confirming superior long-term durability. Commercially available conductive filaments offer a suitable option for rapidly fabricating piezoresistive strain sensors using additive manufacturing technologies. Extending previous work on the RECREUS-based sensors, this study presents a comparative evaluation of the electromechanical performance of strain sensors fabricated from two thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) filaments loaded with carbon black (CB): RECREUS and FILI. These filaments were processed via fused filament fabrication (FFF) to form TPU/CB sensors. To enhance electrical performance, silver interdigitated electrodes were integrated onto the sensor surfaces using direct ink writing (DIW), resulting in hybrid TPU/CB/Ag configurations. The sensors were characterized under quasi-static and dynamic tensile loading to assess their sensitivity, hysteresis, and durability. Sensors fabricated with RECREUS filament exhibited a negative piezoresistive response and high stretchability, with gauge factors ranging from approximately −18.61 to −0.29 for TPU/CB and from −23.78 to 0.45 for TPU/CB/Ag across the entire strain range. In contrast, FILI-based sensors showed a positive, highly linear response at low strain, with gauge factors of approximately 12–123 for TPU/CB and ≈16 for TPU/CB/Ag. The integration of silver electrodes improved electrical stability and reduced hysteresis in both sensor types. During cyclic loading with small strains between 0.2% and 5%, both materials generated an electrical response proportional to the deformation; however, only the FILI-based sensors kept a stable baseline with minimal drift. After 500 cycles, the FILI sensors showed less than 6% signal drift, compared with 27% drift observed in the RECREUS sensors. These findings highlight the influence of filler dispersion and electrode-to-polymer compatibility on sensor reliability and demonstrate that commercially available filaments with nominally similar compositions can exhibit significantly different electromechanical behavior, affecting sensor reliability.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Asociacion de Investigacion de Materiales Plasticos y Conexas (ES), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
21.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.