How to Determine the Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation for VTE: An Evidence-Based Decision-Analytical Approach

When advising patients on the optimal duration of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE), current management often relies on the intuition of treating physicians and guideline panels-an approach that remains opaque to outside observers. We present a decision-analytical framework adopted in our practice. This approach formalizes the intuition of physicians and guideline panels, providing an explicit and transparent integration of the best available evidence on benefits and harms. It also incorporates a systematic method for eliciting patient values and preferences to determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation. To demonstrate the practical utility of the decision-analytical approach, we apply it to three clinical scenarios: unprovoked VTE, VTE related to long-haul travel, and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. By transparently synthesizing evidence and patient values, this method supports individualized, evidence-based, patient-centered recommendations for the duration of anticoagulation, and it applicable to solving similar clinical problems in hematology and medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Advances
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017976
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Determine the Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation for VTE: An Evidence-Based Decision-Analytical Approach

Benjamin Djulbegović, Charles S. Greenberg
Blood Advances
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

How to Determine the Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation for VTE: An Evidence-Based Decision-Analytical Approach

Benjamin Djulbegović, Charles S. Greenberg
article en

Abstract

When advising patients on the optimal duration of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE), current management often relies on the intuition of treating physicians and guideline panels-an approach that remains opaque to outside observers. We present a decision-analytical framework adopted in our practice. This approach formalizes the intuition of physicians and guideline panels, providing an explicit and transparent integration of the best available evidence on benefits and harms. It also incorporates a systematic method for eliciting patient values and preferences to determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation. To demonstrate the practical utility of the decision-analytical approach, we apply it to three clinical scenarios: unprovoked VTE, VTE related to long-haul travel, and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. By transparently synthesizing evidence and patient values, this method supports individualized, evidence-based, patient-centered recommendations for the duration of anticoagulation, and it applicable to solving similar clinical problems in hematology and medicine.

Blood Advances
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.