Investigating the impact of early adversity on perceived support from parents and friends in preadolescence: Do genetic predispositions and timing of exposure matter?

Abstract Background Perceived social support contributes to youth resilience, but perceptions of support differ substantially between youth. Genetic predispositions and early life adversity are potential sources for this variation, but research has yet to test gene‐environment interplay comprehensively. We examined how early adversity and genetic predispositions for educational attainment, internalizing, and externalizing behaviours uniquely and jointly predict parents and friends support at age 11 and explored associations for different timing of adversity. Methods Participants were drawn from TRAILS, a longitudinal study of Dutch adolescents. Adversity was measured during the perinatal period (pregnancy to 1‐month postdelivery) and childhood (ages 0–11) through Preventive Child Healthcare records and parental interviews at age 11. Participants' genotype data were used to derive polygenic scores. Perceived social support from mothers ( n = 1634), fathers ( n = 1609) and friends ( n = 1634) were self‐reported at age 11. Results Genetic predispositions for internalizing and externalizing problems were associated with higher childhood adversity and were indirectly related to lower perceived social support. Exposure to perinatal adversity was related to higher maternal support during adolescence, while childhood adversity was associated with less paternal support. These associations further varied based on specific subtypes of adversity, but not according to adolescents' genetic predispositions. Conclusion Adolescents' genetic liabilities to internalizing and externalizing behaviours predicted early adversity, which correlated with parental but not friends' support. These associations were found to vary based on the timing and nature of adversity, underscoring the need for future studies to more consistently account for these factors and to examine their underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCPP Advances
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70090
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the impact of early adversity on perceived support from parents and friends in preadolescence: Do genetic predispositions and timing of exposure matter?

Christina Y. Cantave, Marthe de Roo, Tina Kretschmer, Charlotte Vrijen
JCPP Advances
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Investigating the impact of early adversity on perceived support from parents and friends in preadolescence: Do genetic predispositions and timing of exposure matter?

Christina Y. Cantave, Marthe de Roo, Tina Kretschmer, Charlotte Vrijen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Perceived social support contributes to youth resilience, but perceptions of support differ substantially between youth. Genetic predispositions and early life adversity are potential sources for this variation, but research has yet to test gene‐environment interplay comprehensively. We examined how early adversity and genetic predispositions for educational attainment, internalizing, and externalizing behaviours uniquely and jointly predict parents and friends support at age 11 and explored associations for different timing of adversity. Methods Participants were drawn from TRAILS, a longitudinal study of Dutch adolescents. Adversity was measured during the perinatal period (pregnancy to 1‐month postdelivery) and childhood (ages 0–11) through Preventive Child Healthcare records and parental interviews at age 11. Participants' genotype data were used to derive polygenic scores. Perceived social support from mothers ( n = 1634), fathers ( n = 1609) and friends ( n = 1634) were self‐reported at age 11. Results Genetic predispositions for internalizing and externalizing problems were associated with higher childhood adversity and were indirectly related to lower perceived social support. Exposure to perinatal adversity was related to higher maternal support during adolescence, while childhood adversity was associated with less paternal support. These associations further varied based on specific subtypes of adversity, but not according to adolescents' genetic predispositions. Conclusion Adolescents' genetic liabilities to internalizing and externalizing behaviours predicted early adversity, which correlated with parental but not friends' support. These associations were found to vary based on the timing and nature of adversity, underscoring the need for future studies to more consistently account for these factors and to examine their underlying mechanisms.

JCPP Advances
University of Minnesota (US), University of Groningen (NL), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
European Science Foundation, ZonMw, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.