Who is behind the eco-label? Certification source, trust in government and their impact on consumer perceptions and willingness to pay a premium

Purpose Over recent decades, organizations have increasingly adopted eco-labels to signal their products' sustainability and ethical attributes. While this proliferation reflects consumer demand and institutional pressures, it has also raised concerns about how eco-labels are perceived in terms of credibility, quality and expensiveness, and how these perceptions influence willingness to pay a premium. This study further examines whether such perceptions depend on receiver's trust in the government. Hence, this study integrates signaling theory and the elaboration likelihood model to answer how source-related signals (government vs private labels) interact with receiver-related information processing (trust in government) to influence consumer perceptions and willingness to pay a premium. Design/methodology/approach This study employs a between-subjects factorial experimental design to investigate the influence of eco-label source, government versus private certification, on consumer perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness, and how these perceptions subsequently shape willingness to pay a premium for eco-labeled products. Furthermore, this study checks the moderating role of trust in government for the relationship between eco-label sources (government and private) and consumer perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness. Findings The findings of the study indicate that the perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness do not significantly differ for the two eco-label sources (government and private) at a 95% confidence interval. Still, perceptions of expensiveness vary at a 90% confidence interval, such that a product with a government eco-label is perceived to be less expensive than a private eco-labeled product. Among the three consumer perceptions, only quality demonstrates a significant positive association with willingness to pay a premium. Furthermore, the inclusion of the moderator, trust in government, alters these relationships: under conditions of high trust in government, the associations between government eco-label and credibility, as well as between government eco-label and quality, become significant. Originality/value The study demonstrates that both the source of eco-labels (government vs private) and trust in government shape consumer perceptions of eco-labeled products, which in turn influence their willingness to pay a premium. The key finding is that government eco-labels are not always superior to private certifications, except under conditions of high institutional trust. The study provides practical insights and theoretical contributions by extending the body of knowledge on eco-label credibility, consumer evaluations, trust in institutions and sustainable consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2025-0268
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is behind the eco-label? Certification source, trust in government and their impact on consumer perceptions and willingness to pay a premium

Naman Sreen, Chinmoy Bandyopadhyay
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Who is behind the eco-label? Certification source, trust in government and their impact on consumer perceptions and willingness to pay a premium

Naman Sreen, Chinmoy Bandyopadhyay
article en

Abstract

Purpose Over recent decades, organizations have increasingly adopted eco-labels to signal their products' sustainability and ethical attributes. While this proliferation reflects consumer demand and institutional pressures, it has also raised concerns about how eco-labels are perceived in terms of credibility, quality and expensiveness, and how these perceptions influence willingness to pay a premium. This study further examines whether such perceptions depend on receiver's trust in the government. Hence, this study integrates signaling theory and the elaboration likelihood model to answer how source-related signals (government vs private labels) interact with receiver-related information processing (trust in government) to influence consumer perceptions and willingness to pay a premium. Design/methodology/approach This study employs a between-subjects factorial experimental design to investigate the influence of eco-label source, government versus private certification, on consumer perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness, and how these perceptions subsequently shape willingness to pay a premium for eco-labeled products. Furthermore, this study checks the moderating role of trust in government for the relationship between eco-label sources (government and private) and consumer perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness. Findings The findings of the study indicate that the perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness do not significantly differ for the two eco-label sources (government and private) at a 95% confidence interval. Still, perceptions of expensiveness vary at a 90% confidence interval, such that a product with a government eco-label is perceived to be less expensive than a private eco-labeled product. Among the three consumer perceptions, only quality demonstrates a significant positive association with willingness to pay a premium. Furthermore, the inclusion of the moderator, trust in government, alters these relationships: under conditions of high trust in government, the associations between government eco-label and credibility, as well as between government eco-label and quality, become significant. Originality/value The study demonstrates that both the source of eco-labels (government vs private) and trust in government shape consumer perceptions of eco-labeled products, which in turn influence their willingness to pay a premium. The key finding is that government eco-labels are not always superior to private certifications, except under conditions of high institutional trust. The study provides practical insights and theoretical contributions by extending the body of knowledge on eco-label credibility, consumer evaluations, trust in institutions and sustainable consumption.

Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Global University (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.