Inequality in Face-to-Face Interactions: Status, Prototypicality, and Subgrouping

We report on the first experimental tests of the integration of status characteristics theory and self-categorization theory. Using 3-person and 6-person group interaction studies, we find mixed support. While members who have higher status in the group, or who have traits prototypical of the group, do impart greater influence over group decision-making, for members who have both high status and prototypical characteristics, the benefits are not additive. Group members are also no more likely to direct behaviors to a fellow group member who displays prototypical traits than to either non-prototypical fellow group members or individuals in an outgroup.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Group Research
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964251404385
Primary Topic
Social Power and Status Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequality in Face-to-Face Interactions: Status, Prototypicality, and Subgrouping

David Melamed, Christopher C. Barnum, Jennifer McLeer
Small Group Research
Social Power and Status Dynamics
article

Inequality in Face-to-Face Interactions: Status, Prototypicality, and Subgrouping

David Melamed, Christopher C. Barnum, Jennifer McLeer
article en

Abstract

We report on the first experimental tests of the integration of status characteristics theory and self-categorization theory. Using 3-person and 6-person group interaction studies, we find mixed support. While members who have higher status in the group, or who have traits prototypical of the group, do impart greater influence over group decision-making, for members who have both high status and prototypical characteristics, the benefits are not additive. Group members are also no more likely to direct behaviors to a fellow group member who displays prototypical traits than to either non-prototypical fellow group members or individuals in an outgroup.

Small Group Research
University of South Carolina (US), University of Hartford (US), Saint Ambrose University (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Social Power and Status Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.