Competition in human genetic technologies: The current US legal landscape

Competition plays a crucial role in driving innovation in the industry of human genetics and genomics technologies. However, the US's policy on competition (such as enforcement of antitrust laws) has shifted over time, affecting the level of regulatory scrutiny that business decisions in the industry will receive. Here, we offer an overview of this changing legal landscape, noting key policy changes at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) relevant to the human genetics and genomics industry. Focusing on the regulatory challenge of Illumina's acquisition of Grail as a case study, we highlight how shifting anti-competition enforcement policy could affect spin-offs, startups, and industry consolidations. Balancing competition and consumer protection policies remains essential for the continued advancement of human genetic and genomic technologies. We offer this perspective in the hopes that it will help inform scientists in the field of the relevant legal considerations and stimulate discussions to shape policy-public and private alike-in ways that promote responsible innovation in genetic and genomic science and technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.12.012
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competition in human genetic technologies: The current US legal landscape

Abdulai Rashid, Jennifer K. Wagner, Nicole A. Rincon, Nathan Rihani
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Competition in human genetic technologies: The current US legal landscape

Abdulai Rashid, Jennifer K. Wagner, Nicole A. Rincon, Nathan Rihani
article en

Abstract

Competition plays a crucial role in driving innovation in the industry of human genetics and genomics technologies. However, the US's policy on competition (such as enforcement of antitrust laws) has shifted over time, affecting the level of regulatory scrutiny that business decisions in the industry will receive. Here, we offer an overview of this changing legal landscape, noting key policy changes at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) relevant to the human genetics and genomics industry. Focusing on the regulatory challenge of Illumina's acquisition of Grail as a case study, we highlight how shifting anti-competition enforcement policy could affect spin-offs, startups, and industry consolidations. Balancing competition and consumer protection policies remains essential for the continued advancement of human genetic and genomic technologies. We offer this perspective in the hopes that it will help inform scientists in the field of the relevant legal considerations and stimulate discussions to shape policy-public and private alike-in ways that promote responsible innovation in genetic and genomic science and technology.

The American Journal of Human GeneticsVol. 113(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Royal Oak Community Coalition (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.