ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS AND BODY WEIGHT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE

Artificial sweeteners (AS), or non-nutritive sweeteners, are widely promoted as sugar substitutes for weight management. Their use is based on the assumption that they lower caloric intake and improve metabolic outcomes, yet the evidence remains conflicting. This review synthesizes findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), preclinical models, observational studies, and mechanistic research. Meta-analyses of RCTs demonstrate modest benefits, with mean reductions of −0.8 kg in body weight and −0.24 kg/m² in BMI. These effects are most evident in short-term interventions, while long-term trials generally report no sustained advantage over sugar or placebo. Preclinical data are heterogeneous: chronic AS exposure in obesity-prone rodents often promotes weight gain and metabolic dysregulation, whereas benefits are observed when AS replace sucrose in energy-restricted conditions. Epidemiological studies associate AS intake with increased risks of obesity (OR ≈ 1.5), type 2 diabetes (OR ≈ 3.7), and hypertension (OR ≈ 1.5). Although residual confounding and reverse causality cannot be excluded, these findings raise concerns about adverse long-term outcomes. Mechanistic studies suggest that AS may alter gut microbiota, impair satiety signaling, and promote compensatory feeding, with additional effects on insulin sensitivity and reward pathways. In summary, AS confer limited short-term benefits and uncertain long-term efficacy in weight control. Concerns raised by observational and mechanistic data support the World Health Organization’s recommendation against their routine use. Future research should clarify sweetener-specific effects, interindividual variability, and long-term outcomes to inform dietary guidelines and public health strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4026
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS AND BODY WEIGHT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE

Izabella Sośniak, Ewa Szczęsna, Marta Miejska-Kamińska, Lidia Jurczenko
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
article

ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS AND BODY WEIGHT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE

Izabella Sośniak, Ewa Szczęsna, Marta Miejska-Kamińska, Lidia Jurczenko
article en

Abstract

Artificial sweeteners (AS), or non-nutritive sweeteners, are widely promoted as sugar substitutes for weight management. Their use is based on the assumption that they lower caloric intake and improve metabolic outcomes, yet the evidence remains conflicting. This review synthesizes findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), preclinical models, observational studies, and mechanistic research. Meta-analyses of RCTs demonstrate modest benefits, with mean reductions of −0.8 kg in body weight and −0.24 kg/m² in BMI. These effects are most evident in short-term interventions, while long-term trials generally report no sustained advantage over sugar or placebo. Preclinical data are heterogeneous: chronic AS exposure in obesity-prone rodents often promotes weight gain and metabolic dysregulation, whereas benefits are observed when AS replace sucrose in energy-restricted conditions. Epidemiological studies associate AS intake with increased risks of obesity (OR ≈ 1.5), type 2 diabetes (OR ≈ 3.7), and hypertension (OR ≈ 1.5). Although residual confounding and reverse causality cannot be excluded, these findings raise concerns about adverse long-term outcomes. Mechanistic studies suggest that AS may alter gut microbiota, impair satiety signaling, and promote compensatory feeding, with additional effects on insulin sensitivity and reward pathways. In summary, AS confer limited short-term benefits and uncertain long-term efficacy in weight control. Concerns raised by observational and mechanistic data support the World Health Organization’s recommendation against their routine use. Future research should clarify sweetener-specific effects, interindividual variability, and long-term outcomes to inform dietary guidelines and public health strategies.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 4(4(48))
Military Hospital (PK), Silesian Center for Heart Disease (PL), Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute (PL), University of Rzeszów (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.