The politics of urban regime contention: A qualitative comparative analysis of 18 Spanish cases

This article contributes to urban regime theory by analysing the conditions enabling the electoral consolidation of social movement-led left coalitions in Spanish cities after 2015. It uses fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to investigate combinations of economic and political factors influencing regime change across 18 cases. The analysis identifies civic capacity as a necessary condition and finds that no single factor is sufficient. Instead, consolidation results from particular combinations: in smaller cities, high representation in local councils and fiscal capacity compensate for hostile upper-tier governments; in larger cities, intergovernmental allies are more critical. Contrary to expectations, capital mobility plays only a small explanatory role, likely due to Spain’s intergovernmental fiscal transfers. These findings underscore the importance of political-institutional factors – especially civic mobilisation and multi-level alliances – for progressive urban governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251405755
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of urban regime contention: A qualitative comparative analysis of 18 Spanish cases

Adrián Bua
Urban Studies
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

The politics of urban regime contention: A qualitative comparative analysis of 18 Spanish cases

Adrián Bua
article en

Abstract

This article contributes to urban regime theory by analysing the conditions enabling the electoral consolidation of social movement-led left coalitions in Spanish cities after 2015. It uses fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to investigate combinations of economic and political factors influencing regime change across 18 cases. The analysis identifies civic capacity as a necessary condition and finds that no single factor is sufficient. Instead, consolidation results from particular combinations: in smaller cities, high representation in local councils and fiscal capacity compensate for hostile upper-tier governments; in larger cities, intergovernmental allies are more critical. Contrary to expectations, capital mobility plays only a small explanatory role, likely due to Spain’s intergovernmental fiscal transfers. These findings underscore the importance of political-institutional factors – especially civic mobilisation and multi-level alliances – for progressive urban governance.

Urban Studies
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The politics of urban regime contention: A qualitative comparative analysis of 18 Spanish cases — Adrián Bua · Urban Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS