The impact of the reform of grassland property rights system on the allocation of production factors for herders in Qinghai, China

This study conducted field visits across six prefectures in Qinghai Province, China, where grassland animal husbandry is the main mode of production and operation. Through discussions with government departments and surveys of 137 herder households, combined with local government survey archives from previous years, a fixed-effects model was established from the herders’ perspective across four time periods to examine how Qinghai’s grassland property rights reform and its supporting policies have influenced herders’ production factor inputs. The results show that: Property rights reform has a positive impact on the investment in available natural grasslands and artificial forage lands. However, as time progresses, the positive effect on natural grassland input is suppressed, while the impact on artificial grasslands strengthens over time. The reform has a significant positive effect on the input of labor for technical and managerial personnel, and this positive impact continues to grow as the reform advances. Conversely, the impact on labor input for herding is negative, but the negative effect gradually weakens with the progression of the reform. Property rights reform increases the breeding costs of the basic livestock herd, but this effect weakens over time. The reform has a significant positive impact on the input for forage and disease prevention, with the positive effect intensifying as the reform progresses. The impact on the input for basic livestock equipment is negative. The reform has a positive effect on grassland management techniques and livestock feeding practices, though the effect on the input of information technology is not significant. Additionally, the accompanying policy reforms, the characteristics of pastoral households, and transportation conditions also have varying degrees of influence on the input of production factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/past.2026.15314
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of the reform of grassland property rights system on the allocation of production factors for herders in Qinghai, China

Yujiao Gou, Airu Zhang, Xinyan Jin, Wu Sun et al.
Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

The impact of the reform of grassland property rights system on the allocation of production factors for herders in Qinghai, China

Yujiao Gou, Airu Zhang, Xinyan Jin, Wu Sun, Lizhuang Hao, Hongbo Ma
article en

Abstract

This study conducted field visits across six prefectures in Qinghai Province, China, where grassland animal husbandry is the main mode of production and operation. Through discussions with government departments and surveys of 137 herder households, combined with local government survey archives from previous years, a fixed-effects model was established from the herders’ perspective across four time periods to examine how Qinghai’s grassland property rights reform and its supporting policies have influenced herders’ production factor inputs. The results show that: Property rights reform has a positive impact on the investment in available natural grasslands and artificial forage lands. However, as time progresses, the positive effect on natural grassland input is suppressed, while the impact on artificial grasslands strengthens over time. The reform has a significant positive effect on the input of labor for technical and managerial personnel, and this positive impact continues to grow as the reform advances. Conversely, the impact on labor input for herding is negative, but the negative effect gradually weakens with the progression of the reform. Property rights reform increases the breeding costs of the basic livestock herd, but this effect weakens over time. The reform has a significant positive impact on the input for forage and disease prevention, with the positive effect intensifying as the reform progresses. The impact on the input for basic livestock equipment is negative. The reform has a positive effect on grassland management techniques and livestock feeding practices, though the effect on the input of information technology is not significant. Additionally, the accompanying policy reforms, the characteristics of pastoral households, and transportation conditions also have varying degrees of influence on the input of production factors.

Pastoralism Research Policy and PracticeVol. 16
Qinghai University (CN), Ministry of Education (IR), Qinghai New Energy (China) (CN), State Forestry and Grassland Administration (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.