Strategies of political control and regime survival in autocracies

How do autocrats establish political control? Understanding the strategies autocrats use to generate mass compliance and elite loyalty remains a central question in comparative politics. Despite substantial scholarship on this topic, ongoing research highlights the need for more comprehensive accounts of how autocrats combine different political control strategies, and which strategies are most important for explaining regime durability across diverse contexts and time periods. This article advances this line of research by integrating data from the Varieties of Democracy and Varieties of Indoctrination datasets to systematically map the use of six key strategies of repression, co-optation, and indoctrination across 229 regimes from 1946 to 2010. We then apply model-based clustering and Bayesian model stacking methods to uncover common patterns in the deployment of these strategies and identify which strategies best predict regime breakdown. The article's rich data, empirical approach, and findings lay the groundwork for more integrated inquiries into autocratic regime performance and longevity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Democratization
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2611256
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies of political control and regime survival in autocracies

Ksenia Northmore‐Ball, Anja Neundorf, Katerina Tertytchnaya, Eugenia Nazrullaeva et al.
Democratization
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Strategies of political control and regime survival in autocracies

Ksenia Northmore‐Ball, Anja Neundorf, Katerina Tertytchnaya, Eugenia Nazrullaeva, Wooseok Kim
article en

Abstract

How do autocrats establish political control? Understanding the strategies autocrats use to generate mass compliance and elite loyalty remains a central question in comparative politics. Despite substantial scholarship on this topic, ongoing research highlights the need for more comprehensive accounts of how autocrats combine different political control strategies, and which strategies are most important for explaining regime durability across diverse contexts and time periods. This article advances this line of research by integrating data from the Varieties of Democracy and Varieties of Indoctrination datasets to systematically map the use of six key strategies of repression, co-optation, and indoctrination across 229 regimes from 1946 to 2010. We then apply model-based clustering and Bayesian model stacking methods to uncover common patterns in the deployment of these strategies and identify which strategies best predict regime breakdown. The article's rich data, empirical approach, and findings lay the groundwork for more integrated inquiries into autocratic regime performance and longevity.

Democratization
University of Liverpool (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies of political control and regime survival in autocracies — Ksenia Northmore‐Ball, Anja Neundorf, et al. · Democratization (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS