Proportion, etiology, predictors, and clinical outcomes of sepsis in neurosurgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Abstract Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with in-hospital mortality rate exceeding 30% in critically ill patients. The increasing burden of sepsis in neurosurgical patients is a complex and poorly understood clinical challenge, underscoring the need for evidence-informed decision-making. This review aims to assess the proportion, etiology, predictors, and clinical outcomes in sepsis in neurosurgical patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Databases to be searched include PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to date. We will include original peer-reviewed articles reporting primary data. Additionally, reference lists of relevant reviews will be screened for additional eligible studies. Two independent reviewers will screen records, extract data, and assess risk of bias using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.00 tool. In meta-analysis, the effect will be measured using proportions, odds ratios, relative risks, or mean differences, with their 95% confidence intervals. The I2 and τ2 will describe heterogeneity. Where applicable, meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. About 95% prediction intervals will measure the expected range of the effect in future studies. Ethical approval is not required. Findings are expected to inform more effective treatment guidelines, while also guiding public health strategies through optimized resource allocation, increased investment in prophylactic and postoperative care, and evidence-based policy development. Systematic Review Registration: The protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD420251088061).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research Methodologies
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snaf023
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportion, etiology, predictors, and clinical outcomes of sepsis in neurosurgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

S Sankar, Linda J Kelly, Ihsaan H. Patel, BTCA et al.
Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research Methodologies
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Proportion, etiology, predictors, and clinical outcomes of sepsis in neurosurgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

S Sankar, Linda J Kelly, Ihsaan H. Patel, BTCA, Josué Aganze Mwambali, Franklin J Crossen, Aura Ilovan, Suhani Sharma, Gates Iragi Mulume
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with in-hospital mortality rate exceeding 30% in critically ill patients. The increasing burden of sepsis in neurosurgical patients is a complex and poorly understood clinical challenge, underscoring the need for evidence-informed decision-making. This review aims to assess the proportion, etiology, predictors, and clinical outcomes in sepsis in neurosurgical patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Databases to be searched include PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to date. We will include original peer-reviewed articles reporting primary data. Additionally, reference lists of relevant reviews will be screened for additional eligible studies. Two independent reviewers will screen records, extract data, and assess risk of bias using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.00 tool. In meta-analysis, the effect will be measured using proportions, odds ratios, relative risks, or mean differences, with their 95% confidence intervals. The I2 and τ2 will describe heterogeneity. Where applicable, meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. About 95% prediction intervals will measure the expected range of the effect in future studies. Ethical approval is not required. Findings are expected to inform more effective treatment guidelines, while also guiding public health strategies through optimized resource allocation, increased investment in prophylactic and postoperative care, and evidence-based policy development. Systematic Review Registration: The protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD420251088061).

Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research MethodologiesVol. 2026
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Kigali (RW), Université Catholique de Bukavu (CD), Rwanda Military Hospital (RW), African Governance and Development Institute (CM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.