The dual gap ionization chamber: a novel ionization chamber design for reference dosimetry to automatically correct for recombination losses in emerging radiotherapy modalities

<i>Objective.</i>Current dosimetry protocols typically recommend multiple measurements to determine recombination correction factors (ks), increasing the time required for dose measurements in the quality assurance workflow. We propose a novel dual-gap ionization chamber (DGIC) design for reference dosimetry featuring two air gaps of different thicknesses within a single device. This design enables the determination ofksdirectly from the same measurements required to determine absorbed dose-to-water. Thus, eliminating the need for separate measurements to correct for recombination losses. The approach relies on analyzing the charge ratio between the two gaps, under ultra high dose rates (UHDR) and dose per pulse (DPP) under ultra high DPP (UHDPP) conditions.<i>Approach.</i>A DGIC prototype with electrode distances of 1 and 0.6 mm was developed and tested using different beam qualities: (1) a 240 MeV u<sup>-1</sup>clinical carbon ion beam at conventional field dose rates of 25 Gy min<sup>-1</sup>, (2) a 226 MeV continuous proton beam with a current between 5 and 800 nA at the cyclotron exit, where the maximum approximately corresponds to 200 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>in the treatment room and (3) a 9 MeV electron beam with a DPP from 0.03 to 4.2 Gy, a frequency of 60 Hz and a pulse duration between 0.7-3.9μs.ks-factors were derived for the top cavity of 1 mm gap using the DGIC method and compared against the following: for proton and carbon ions, comparisons were made with the Jaffé plot method. For the electron beam, it was compared with a dose rate independent device, a flashDiamond detector, and the integrated current transformer of the LINAC.<i>Main results.</i>A DGIC prototype was able to successfully correct for recombination losses under different beam modalities: for initial recombination in a clinical carbon ion beam, volume recombination in UHDR proton beam with field dose rates of 200 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>and in UHDPP electron beams, where four pulses were delivered with DPP up to 4.2 Gy (this DPP corresponds to an effective pulse duration of 3.9μs).<i>Significance.</i>A DGIC design and its inherent method provides a practical and accurate way of determining dose and dose rate in emerging radiotherapy treatment modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae3b05
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dual gap ionization chamber: a novel ionization chamber design for reference dosimetry to automatically correct for recombination losses in emerging radiotherapy modalities

Edmond Sterpin, N. Durny, Séverine Rossomme, Verdi Vanreusel et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

The dual gap ionization chamber: a novel ionization chamber design for reference dosimetry to automatically correct for recombination losses in emerging radiotherapy modalities

Edmond Sterpin, N. Durny, Séverine Rossomme, Verdi Vanreusel, Kevin Souris, Sébastien Penninckx, Marina Orts, Lies Verpoest, Victor de Beco, Guillaume Gabriel Houyoux, Hugo Palmans, Peter Kuess, Pierre-Gabriel Montay-Gruel, Thomas Haas
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Current dosimetry protocols typically recommend multiple measurements to determine recombination correction factors (ks), increasing the time required for dose measurements in the quality assurance workflow. We propose a novel dual-gap ionization chamber (DGIC) design for reference dosimetry featuring two air gaps of different thicknesses within a single device. This design enables the determination ofksdirectly from the same measurements required to determine absorbed dose-to-water. Thus, eliminating the need for separate measurements to correct for recombination losses. The approach relies on analyzing the charge ratio between the two gaps, under ultra high dose rates (UHDR) and dose per pulse (DPP) under ultra high DPP (UHDPP) conditions.<i>Approach.</i>A DGIC prototype with electrode distances of 1 and 0.6 mm was developed and tested using different beam qualities: (1) a 240 MeV u<sup>-1</sup>clinical carbon ion beam at conventional field dose rates of 25 Gy min<sup>-1</sup>, (2) a 226 MeV continuous proton beam with a current between 5 and 800 nA at the cyclotron exit, where the maximum approximately corresponds to 200 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>in the treatment room and (3) a 9 MeV electron beam with a DPP from 0.03 to 4.2 Gy, a frequency of 60 Hz and a pulse duration between 0.7-3.9μs.ks-factors were derived for the top cavity of 1 mm gap using the DGIC method and compared against the following: for proton and carbon ions, comparisons were made with the Jaffé plot method. For the electron beam, it was compared with a dose rate independent device, a flashDiamond detector, and the integrated current transformer of the LINAC.<i>Main results.</i>A DGIC prototype was able to successfully correct for recombination losses under different beam modalities: for initial recombination in a clinical carbon ion beam, volume recombination in UHDR proton beam with field dose rates of 200 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>and in UHDPP electron beams, where four pulses were delivered with DPP up to 4.2 Gy (this DPP corresponds to an effective pulse duration of 3.9μs).<i>Significance.</i>A DGIC design and its inherent method provides a practical and accurate way of determining dose and dose rate in emerging radiotherapy treatment modalities.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 71(3)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), National Physical Laboratory (GB), University of Antwerp (BE), Institut Jules Bordet (BE), Ion Beam Applications (Belgium) (BE), Institute of Particle Physics (CA), Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE), European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (BE), Ion Beam Applications (France) (FR), Iridium Kankernetwerk (BE), MedAustron (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.