Beyond No-Cost Screening: Ensuring Completion of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Continuum after <i>Kennedy v. Braidwood</i>

The 2025 Kennedy v. Braidwood Supreme Court decision upheld the Affordable Care Act mandate requiring insurance coverage of preventive services with an A/B rating from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) without cost-sharing. This ruling preserved access to essential preventive care, including colorectal cancer screening, a leading cause of cancer-related mortality despite the availability of effective, evidence-based screening methods. The recent elimination of out-of-pocket costs for follow-up colonoscopy after positive stool testing resulted in an absolute increase of 1.48% in follow-up procedures, highlighting the impact of financial barriers on the completion of the screening continuum. Yet nonfinancial barriers such as limited transportation, language barriers, and scheduling challenges persist. Patient navigation services addressing these barriers have demonstrated substantial improvements in screening adherence and diagnostic completion but remain inconsistently covered. Recent federal policies about breast and cervical cancer screening have expanded the definition of screening to include follow-up care and navigation services, now requiring coverage of these services by private insurers and Medicaid without cost-sharing. Colorectal cancer screening coverage should similarly expand to include these critical support services. Aligning policy with the realities of patient access will enhance screening uptake, reduce disparities, and strengthen the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer prevention efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Prevention Research
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-25-0359
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond No-Cost Screening: Ensuring Completion of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Continuum after Kennedy v. Braidwood

Uri Ladabaum, Jordan Anders-Rumsey, A. Mark Fendrick
Cancer Prevention Research
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Beyond No-Cost Screening: Ensuring Completion of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Continuum after Kennedy v. Braidwood

Uri Ladabaum, Jordan Anders-Rumsey, A. Mark Fendrick
article en

Abstract

The 2025 Kennedy v. Braidwood Supreme Court decision upheld the Affordable Care Act mandate requiring insurance coverage of preventive services with an A/B rating from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) without cost-sharing. This ruling preserved access to essential preventive care, including colorectal cancer screening, a leading cause of cancer-related mortality despite the availability of effective, evidence-based screening methods. The recent elimination of out-of-pocket costs for follow-up colonoscopy after positive stool testing resulted in an absolute increase of 1.48% in follow-up procedures, highlighting the impact of financial barriers on the completion of the screening continuum. Yet nonfinancial barriers such as limited transportation, language barriers, and scheduling challenges persist. Patient navigation services addressing these barriers have demonstrated substantial improvements in screening adherence and diagnostic completion but remain inconsistently covered. Recent federal policies about breast and cervical cancer screening have expanded the definition of screening to include follow-up care and navigation services, now requiring coverage of these services by private insurers and Medicaid without cost-sharing. Colorectal cancer screening coverage should similarly expand to include these critical support services. Aligning policy with the realities of patient access will enhance screening uptake, reduce disparities, and strengthen the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer prevention efforts.

Cancer Prevention ResearchVol. 19(2)
Palo Alto University (US), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond No-Cost Screening: Ensuring Completion of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Continuum after <i>Kennedy v. Braidwood</i> — Uri Ladabaum, Jordan Anders-Rumsey, et al. · Cancer Prevention Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS