Decreased nonvertebral fracture incidence with zoledronate use for >3 years: post hoc analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

The anti-fracture efficacy of most osteoporosis drugs is assessed in trials of up to three years duration. However, treatment of osteoporosis is required long-term, so it is important to know whether effectiveness of treatment changes over time. To-date, this information has only been available from open extensions of the treatment groups from clinical trials. Such data are subject to selective loss of frailer patients from the cohort, and no placebo comparator group is available to permit reliable measurement of anti-fracture efficacy. The 6-year Auckland zoledronate RCT administered zoledronate or placebo every 18 months to 2000 osteopenic women aged >65 years. It is longer than most osteoporosis trials, and only 3.6% of participants withdrew or were lost to follow-up. Therefore, anti-fracture efficacy can be validly compared between the first and second halves of this study. There were 178 non-vertebral fractures in the placebo group and 108 in the zoledronate group (excluding fractures of the hands, feet and face). Fracture rates per 1000 women-years in the placebo group were 28 (95%CI 23, 35) and 32 (26, 40) in years 1-3 and years 4-6, respectively. In the zoledronate group, fracture rates were 23 (18, 30) and 13 (9, 18) per 1000 women-years in the first and second halves of the study. The rate ratios for non-vertebral fractures were 0.83 (0.60, 1.14) in years 1-3, and 0.40 (0.27, 0.58) in years 4-6 (between-period comparison, P<0.05). Rate ratios for total fragility fractures, which include vertebral fractures also, showed a similar pattern: years 1-3, 0.76 (0.56, 1.02); years 4-6, 0.39 (0.29, 0.53). These findings suggest that the efficacy for non-vertebral fracture prevention of anti-resorptive drugs has been underestimated because of the short-term evaluation of their effects. Further, it indicates that longer term treatment with these drugs may yield greater benefit to patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjag012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decreased nonvertebral fracture incidence with zoledronate use for &gt;3 years: post hoc analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

G. D. Gamble, Ian R. Reid, Anne Horne, Mark J Bolland et al.
1 citations
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Bone health and osteoporosis research
39.58
article

Decreased nonvertebral fracture incidence with zoledronate use for &gt;3 years: post hoc analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

G. D. Gamble, Ian R. Reid, Anne Horne, Mark J Bolland, Sonja Bastin, Borislav Mihov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The anti-fracture efficacy of most osteoporosis drugs is assessed in trials of up to three years duration. However, treatment of osteoporosis is required long-term, so it is important to know whether effectiveness of treatment changes over time. To-date, this information has only been available from open extensions of the treatment groups from clinical trials. Such data are subject to selective loss of frailer patients from the cohort, and no placebo comparator group is available to permit reliable measurement of anti-fracture efficacy. The 6-year Auckland zoledronate RCT administered zoledronate or placebo every 18 months to 2000 osteopenic women aged >65 years. It is longer than most osteoporosis trials, and only 3.6% of participants withdrew or were lost to follow-up. Therefore, anti-fracture efficacy can be validly compared between the first and second halves of this study. There were 178 non-vertebral fractures in the placebo group and 108 in the zoledronate group (excluding fractures of the hands, feet and face). Fracture rates per 1000 women-years in the placebo group were 28 (95%CI 23, 35) and 32 (26, 40) in years 1-3 and years 4-6, respectively. In the zoledronate group, fracture rates were 23 (18, 30) and 13 (9, 18) per 1000 women-years in the first and second halves of the study. The rate ratios for non-vertebral fractures were 0.83 (0.60, 1.14) in years 1-3, and 0.40 (0.27, 0.58) in years 4-6 (between-period comparison, P<0.05). Rate ratios for total fragility fractures, which include vertebral fractures also, showed a similar pattern: years 1-3, 0.76 (0.56, 1.02); years 4-6, 0.39 (0.29, 0.53). These findings suggest that the efficacy for non-vertebral fracture prevention of anti-resorptive drugs has been underestimated because of the short-term evaluation of their effects. Further, it indicates that longer term treatment with these drugs may yield greater benefit to patients.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland District Health Board (NZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
39.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.