Community-based versus commercial feedlots: a systematic review of their roles in promoting sustainable and climate-resilient livestock production in Southern Africa

Livestock production systems in Southern Africa face mounting challenges from climate change, land degradation, and feed scarcity, threatening both productivity and rural livelihoods. This systematic review compares community-based feedlots (CBFs) and commercial feedlots to evaluate their respective contributions to sustainable and climate-resilient livestock production. A total of 42 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2024 across eight Southern African countries were analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. The synthesis examines differences in productivity performance, environmental outcomes, socio-economic benefits, and institutional resilience. Results indicate that commercial feedlots outperform CBFs in technical efficiency, achieving higher average daily gains (1.2–1.6 kg/day), superior feed conversion ratios (5.0–6.0 kg feed DM/kg weight gain), and faster market turnover. Conversely, CBFs demonstrate greater social inclusivity, local adaptability, and resilience to climatic stress, particularly in drought-prone communal areas. They promote community participation, create rural employment, empower women and youth, and reduce grazing pressure on communal rangelands during dry seasons. Both systems, however, face sustainability trade-offs: commercial feedlots are associated with higher greenhouse gas emissions and concentrated waste, while CBFs struggle with nutrient overloads and limited waste management capacity. Common constraints affecting both models include fluctuating feed costs, inadequate market access, weak infrastructure, and insufficient extension support. The review concludes that, combining the technical efficiency of commercial operations with the inclusivity and adaptive capacity of CBFs, represents a viable pathway toward climate-smart, sustainable, and socially equitable livestock systems in Southern Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1680759
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-based versus commercial feedlots: a systematic review of their roles in promoting sustainable and climate-resilient livestock production in Southern Africa

Siphe Zantsi, Mhlangabezi Slayi
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Community-based versus commercial feedlots: a systematic review of their roles in promoting sustainable and climate-resilient livestock production in Southern Africa

Siphe Zantsi, Mhlangabezi Slayi
article en

Abstract

Livestock production systems in Southern Africa face mounting challenges from climate change, land degradation, and feed scarcity, threatening both productivity and rural livelihoods. This systematic review compares community-based feedlots (CBFs) and commercial feedlots to evaluate their respective contributions to sustainable and climate-resilient livestock production. A total of 42 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2024 across eight Southern African countries were analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. The synthesis examines differences in productivity performance, environmental outcomes, socio-economic benefits, and institutional resilience. Results indicate that commercial feedlots outperform CBFs in technical efficiency, achieving higher average daily gains (1.2–1.6 kg/day), superior feed conversion ratios (5.0–6.0 kg feed DM/kg weight gain), and faster market turnover. Conversely, CBFs demonstrate greater social inclusivity, local adaptability, and resilience to climatic stress, particularly in drought-prone communal areas. They promote community participation, create rural employment, empower women and youth, and reduce grazing pressure on communal rangelands during dry seasons. Both systems, however, face sustainability trade-offs: commercial feedlots are associated with higher greenhouse gas emissions and concentrated waste, while CBFs struggle with nutrient overloads and limited waste management capacity. Common constraints affecting both models include fluctuating feed costs, inadequate market access, weak infrastructure, and insufficient extension support. The review concludes that, combining the technical efficiency of commercial operations with the inclusivity and adaptive capacity of CBFs, represents a viable pathway toward climate-smart, sustainable, and socially equitable livestock systems in Southern Africa.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 10
University of Fort Hare (ZA), University of South Africa (ZA), Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (IT), Institute for Sustainable Development (ET)
University of Fort Hare
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.