Community benchmarking and evaluation of human unannotated microprotein detection by mass spectrometry based proteomics

Thousands of short open reading frames (sORFs) are translated outside of annotated coding sequences. Recent studies have pioneered searching for sORF-encoded microproteins in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics and peptidomics datasets. Here, we assessed literature-reported MS-based identifications of unannotated human proteins. We find that studies vary by three orders of magnitude in the number of unannotated proteins they report. Of nearly 10,000 reported sORF-encoded peptides, 96% were unique to a single study, and 12% mapped to annotated proteins or proteoforms. Manual curation of a benchmark dataset of 406 manually evaluated spectra from 204 sORF-encoded proteins revealed large variation in peptide-spectrum match (PSM) quality between studies, with immunopeptidomics studies generally reporting higher quality PSMs than conventional enzymatic digests of whole cell lysates. We estimate that 65% of predicted sORF-encoded protein detections in immunopeptidomics studies were supported by high-quality PSMs versus 7.8% in non-immunopeptidomics datasets. Our work stresses the need for standardized protocols and analysis workflows to guide future advancements in microprotein detection by MS towards uncovering how many human microproteins exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-68002-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
48.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community benchmarking and evaluation of human unannotated microprotein detection by mass spectrometry based proteomics

Kevin Jiang, Jyoti S. Choudhary, Sébastien Leblanc, Sonia Chothani et al.
3 citations
Nature Communications
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
48.78
article

Community benchmarking and evaluation of human unannotated microprotein detection by mass spectrometry based proteomics

Kevin Jiang, Jyoti S. Choudhary, Sébastien Leblanc, Sonia Chothani, Thomas F. Martínez, Ivo Fierro-Monti, Xavier ROUCOU, Jonathan M. Mudge, Jorge Ruiz‐Orera, Sarah A. Slavoff, Anne‐Ruxandra Carvunis, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Jip T. van Dinter, James C. Wright, Jiwon Lee, Marie A. Brunet, Michal Bassani‐Sternberg, Sebastiaan van Heesch, Leron W. Kok, Ihor Arefiev, Francis Bourassa, Félix-Antoine Trifiro, Ayodya H Jayatissa, Kevin Cao, Jana Schulz, Eric W. Deutsch, Annelies Bogaert, Aaron Wacholder, Pavel V. Baranov, Robert L. Moritz, John R. Prensner, Kris Gevaert
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Thousands of short open reading frames (sORFs) are translated outside of annotated coding sequences. Recent studies have pioneered searching for sORF-encoded microproteins in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics and peptidomics datasets. Here, we assessed literature-reported MS-based identifications of unannotated human proteins. We find that studies vary by three orders of magnitude in the number of unannotated proteins they report. Of nearly 10,000 reported sORF-encoded peptides, 96% were unique to a single study, and 12% mapped to annotated proteins or proteoforms. Manual curation of a benchmark dataset of 406 manually evaluated spectra from 204 sORF-encoded proteins revealed large variation in peptide-spectrum match (PSM) quality between studies, with immunopeptidomics studies generally reporting higher quality PSMs than conventional enzymatic digests of whole cell lysates. We estimate that 65% of predicted sORF-encoded protein detections in immunopeptidomics studies were supported by high-quality PSMs versus 7.8% in non-immunopeptidomics datasets. Our work stresses the need for standardized protocols and analysis workflows to guide future advancements in microprotein detection by MS towards uncovering how many human microproteins exist.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
European Bioinformatics Institute (GB), Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (DE), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Max Delbrück Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University College Cork (IE), University of Michigan (US), Cancer Research UK (GB), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Institute for Systems Biology (US), Ghent University (BE), Yale University (US), Health and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke (CA), Granta Design (United Kingdom) (GB), Oncode Institute (NL), Ludwig Cancer Research (CH), Systems Biology Institute (JP), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), Princess Máxima Center (NL), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology (BE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Heidelberg University (US)
National Science Foundation, Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, CureSearch for Children's Cancer, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Wellcome Trust, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung, Morgan Adams Foundation, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hope Foundation, Curing Kids Cancer, British Heart Foundation, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fondation Leducq, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering, Swiss Cancer Research Foundation, Swiss Bridge Foundation, Stichting Villa Joep, National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Cancer Institute, Hyundai Hope On Wheels
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
48.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.