Genesis of Proto-Indo Languages in the Light of Neo-Nationalism in India: Problem, Challenges and Possibilities

India’s multilingual landscape, characterized by profound linguistic diversity and historical stratification, has long been structured around persistent binary oppositions that shape both linguistic practices and academic discourse. Prominent among these are the hierarchical distinctions between Sanskrit (as the refined, classical, and “cultured” language of sacred texts and elite knowledge) and Prakrit (the “natural,” vernacular forms associated with everyday speech and the masses), as well as the postcolonial tensions between English and indigenous/regional languages. This article interrogates these oppositions not as natural or fixed categories but as constructed hierarchies embedded in cultural, political, and ideological discourses, revealing their instability, mutual interdependence, and role in perpetuating exclusionary structures within Indian languages and knowledge production.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18328486
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genesis of Proto-Indo Languages in the Light of Neo-Nationalism in India: Problem, Challenges and Possibilities

Santosh Prakash Patil
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Genesis of Proto-Indo Languages in the Light of Neo-Nationalism in India: Problem, Challenges and Possibilities

Santosh Prakash Patil
article en

Abstract

India’s multilingual landscape, characterized by profound linguistic diversity and historical stratification, has long been structured around persistent binary oppositions that shape both linguistic practices and academic discourse. Prominent among these are the hierarchical distinctions between Sanskrit (as the refined, classical, and “cultured” language of sacred texts and elite knowledge) and Prakrit (the “natural,” vernacular forms associated with everyday speech and the masses), as well as the postcolonial tensions between English and indigenous/regional languages. This article interrogates these oppositions not as natural or fixed categories but as constructed hierarchies embedded in cultural, political, and ideological discourses, revealing their instability, mutual interdependence, and role in perpetuating exclusionary structures within Indian languages and knowledge production.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.