Consideration of cultural ecosystem service indicators in determining spatial zoning in urban spatial plans

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) refer to the intangible advantages that individuals derive from ecosystems, which play a crucial role in enhancing both human well-being and the sustainability of urban areas. Although these services are vital, they are frequently difficult to measure and incorporate into conventional zoning practices within urban planning. This research explores a framework designed to systematically embed CES indicators—such as access to recreational opportunities, scores for aesthetic value, and density of cultural heritage—into the urban zoning decision-making process. Through a case study method, we present a technique for mapping and assessing the supply and demand of important CES categories, converting this information into spatial constraints and opportunities relevant to zoning regulations. The findings reveal that the integration of CES indicators leads to more multifunctional and equitable spatial plans, particularly concerning the distribution of green infrastructure and protected cultural areas. This research provides practical guidance for urban planners to move beyond traditional land-use criteria and embrace a holistic, ecosystem-based approach to spatial zoning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668807011/pdf
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consideration of cultural ecosystem service indicators in determining spatial zoning in urban spatial plans

Iwan Aminto Ardi, Sri Rum Giyarsih, M. Rokhis Khomarudin
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Consideration of cultural ecosystem service indicators in determining spatial zoning in urban spatial plans

Iwan Aminto Ardi, Sri Rum Giyarsih, M. Rokhis Khomarudin
article en

Abstract

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) refer to the intangible advantages that individuals derive from ecosystems, which play a crucial role in enhancing both human well-being and the sustainability of urban areas. Although these services are vital, they are frequently difficult to measure and incorporate into conventional zoning practices within urban planning. This research explores a framework designed to systematically embed CES indicators—such as access to recreational opportunities, scores for aesthetic value, and density of cultural heritage—into the urban zoning decision-making process. Through a case study method, we present a technique for mapping and assessing the supply and demand of important CES categories, converting this information into spatial constraints and opportunities relevant to zoning regulations. The findings reveal that the integration of CES indicators leads to more multifunctional and equitable spatial plans, particularly concerning the distribution of green infrastructure and protected cultural areas. This research provides practical guidance for urban planners to move beyond traditional land-use criteria and embrace a holistic, ecosystem-based approach to spatial zoning.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consideration of cultural ecosystem service indicators in determining spatial zoning in urban spatial plans — Iwan Aminto Ardi, Sri Rum Giyarsih, et al. · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS