Real-World Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines During the 2024–2025 Season: Subgroup Analyses by Virus Subtype, Time Since Vaccination, and Diagnostic Method

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite high vaccination coverage, influenza remains a public health concern in South Korea, particularly in older adults. Continuous evaluation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) is essential to optimize immunization strategies. <b>Methods</b>: This study evaluated seasonal influenza VE for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza using a test-negative design through a hospital-based influenza surveillance system in South Korea from 1 November 2024, to 30 April 2025. Demographic and clinical information was collected through questionnaire surveys and electronic medical records. Influenza was diagnosed using rapid antigen tests (RATs) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and vaccine effectiveness was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. <b>Results</b>: In total, 3954 participants were included, with 1977 influenza-positive cases and 1977 test-negative controls. Influenza A and B accounted for 93.1% and 7.0% of cases, respectively. The adjusted overall VE was 20.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-30.9; <i>p</i> = 0.002). VE was higher in adults aged 50-64 years (46.8%) than in those aged ≥65 years (18.8%). VE was 19.9% against influenza A and 45.7% against A/H3N2. VE was higher among individuals tested using RT-qPCR than among those tested using RATs (21.5% vs. 15.7%), and was also greater during the early period than during the late period (20.5% vs. 11.4%). Vaccination did not reduce influenza-associated hospitalization risk (VE, 17.3%; 95% CI, -9.3 to 37.4). A significant reduction in hospitalization risk was observed in adults aged 50-64 years (VE, 46.8%), with no significant benefit in those aged ≥65 years. <b>Conclusions</b>: The 2024-2025 seasonal influenza vaccine provided moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza in adults, with higher effectiveness in those aged 50-64 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010102
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines During the 2024–2025 Season: Subgroup Analyses by Virus Subtype, Time Since Vaccination, and Diagnostic Method

Eliel Nham, Yu Jung Choi, Jungmin. Lee, J. Yoon et al.
Vaccines
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Real-World Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines During the 2024–2025 Season: Subgroup Analyses by Virus Subtype, Time Since Vaccination, and Diagnostic Method

Eliel Nham, Yu Jung Choi, Jungmin. Lee, J. Yoon, Jacob Lee, Jang Wook Sohn, Joong Sik Eom, H S Jeong, Won Suk Choi, Jin-Soo Lee, Man-Seong Park, Young Kyung Yoon, Joon Young Song, Seong-Heon Wie, Hee Jin Cheong, Ji Yun Noh
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite high vaccination coverage, influenza remains a public health concern in South Korea, particularly in older adults. Continuous evaluation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) is essential to optimize immunization strategies. <b>Methods</b>: This study evaluated seasonal influenza VE for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza using a test-negative design through a hospital-based influenza surveillance system in South Korea from 1 November 2024, to 30 April 2025. Demographic and clinical information was collected through questionnaire surveys and electronic medical records. Influenza was diagnosed using rapid antigen tests (RATs) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and vaccine effectiveness was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. <b>Results</b>: In total, 3954 participants were included, with 1977 influenza-positive cases and 1977 test-negative controls. Influenza A and B accounted for 93.1% and 7.0% of cases, respectively. The adjusted overall VE was 20.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-30.9; <i>p</i> = 0.002). VE was higher in adults aged 50-64 years (46.8%) than in those aged ≥65 years (18.8%). VE was 19.9% against influenza A and 45.7% against A/H3N2. VE was higher among individuals tested using RT-qPCR than among those tested using RATs (21.5% vs. 15.7%), and was also greater during the early period than during the late period (20.5% vs. 11.4%). Vaccination did not reduce influenza-associated hospitalization risk (VE, 17.3%; 95% CI, -9.3 to 37.4). A significant reduction in hospitalization risk was observed in adults aged 50-64 years (VE, 46.8%), with no significant benefit in those aged ≥65 years. <b>Conclusions</b>: The 2024-2025 seasonal influenza vaccine provided moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza in adults, with higher effectiveness in those aged 50-64 years.

VaccinesVol. 14(1)
International Vaccine Institute (KR), Hallym University (KR), Chungbuk National University (KR), Inha University (KR), Korea University (KR), Gachon University Gil Medical Center (KR), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.