Investigating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Intervention for Conduction Aphasia: A Double-blind Controlled Study

A BSTRACT Aim and Background: Aphasia is a language disorder that develops as a result of cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative events, with conduction aphasia being a subtype characterized by speech errors and difficulties in object naming and word repetition. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a valuable neuromodulation technique employed both in clinical settings for therapeutic interventions and in neuroscience research to investigate brain function and neuroplasticity. This study investigated tDCS as a therapeutic intervention, aiming to increase synaptic plasticity of perilesional cortical regions by modulating neural excitation. Materials and Methods: Using a double-blind, controlled design, 20 patients were randomly allocated to receive either active anodal or sham stimulation for 5 consecutive days. Assessments were conducted prestimulation, poststimulation, and at 1-month follow-up. The study hypothesized that anodal stimulation would reduce paraphasias while improving object naming and repetition abilities. Results: The findings showed that the active group’s paraphasia scores during object naming tasks showed a significant reduction when compared with the sham group. For object naming ability, although between-group differences were not significant, the active group demonstrated significant within-group improvement from pre- to poststimulation ( P < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.54), demonstrating a moderate magnitude of effect with potential clinical relevance. No significant differences were observed in repetition abilities. Conclusion: These findings suggest that tDCS positively impacts language disabilities in conduction aphasia, particularly for paraphasia and object naming tasks. The moderate effect size in object naming improvement warrants further investigation with larger sample sizes to establish whether tDCS is a viable therapeutic option for conduction aphasia rehabilitation programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_59_25
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Intervention for Conduction Aphasia: A Double-blind Controlled Study

Serkan Adıgüzel, Şişman Bal Simge, Karamürsel Sacit, Aksu Serkan
Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Investigating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Intervention for Conduction Aphasia: A Double-blind Controlled Study

Serkan Adıgüzel, Şişman Bal Simge, Karamürsel Sacit, Aksu Serkan
article en

Abstract

A BSTRACT Aim and Background: Aphasia is a language disorder that develops as a result of cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative events, with conduction aphasia being a subtype characterized by speech errors and difficulties in object naming and word repetition. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a valuable neuromodulation technique employed both in clinical settings for therapeutic interventions and in neuroscience research to investigate brain function and neuroplasticity. This study investigated tDCS as a therapeutic intervention, aiming to increase synaptic plasticity of perilesional cortical regions by modulating neural excitation. Materials and Methods: Using a double-blind, controlled design, 20 patients were randomly allocated to receive either active anodal or sham stimulation for 5 consecutive days. Assessments were conducted prestimulation, poststimulation, and at 1-month follow-up. The study hypothesized that anodal stimulation would reduce paraphasias while improving object naming and repetition abilities. Results: The findings showed that the active group’s paraphasia scores during object naming tasks showed a significant reduction when compared with the sham group. For object naming ability, although between-group differences were not significant, the active group demonstrated significant within-group improvement from pre- to poststimulation ( P < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.54), demonstrating a moderate magnitude of effect with potential clinical relevance. No significant differences were observed in repetition abilities. Conclusion: These findings suggest that tDCS positively impacts language disabilities in conduction aphasia, particularly for paraphasia and object naming tasks. The moderate effect size in object naming improvement warrants further investigation with larger sample sizes to establish whether tDCS is a viable therapeutic option for conduction aphasia rehabilitation programs.

Neurological Sciences and NeurophysiologyVol. 42(4)
Koç University (TR), Istanbul University (TR), Muğla University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.