When sharing power leads to taking it back: A shift from empowering to directive leadership

Abstract Leader behaviour shifts across days, and empowering acts may shape leaders' subsequent self‐regulation. Using a leader‐centric, within‐person lens, we test whether daily empowering leadership is associated with self‐regulatory demands and when such demands arise. Drawing on control theory, we argue that power sharing requires continual calibration to keep autonomy and accountability aligned and may coincide with higher day‐level regulatory strain indexed by leaders' self‐reported ego depletion. We further propose that this strain is more likely when subordinates are low in proactive personality, and that strain is associated with greater directive leadership the next day as a structured response. We tested these expectations in a 10‐day experience‐sampling study of 129 supervisor–subordinate dyads (719 observations) in a military setting. Multilevel lagged analyses showed a conditional pattern consistent with next‐day strain and the subsequent shift towards directive behaviour. These findings clarify when empowerment becomes harder to sustain and how leaders adapt by increasing structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70088
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When sharing power leads to taking it back: A shift from empowering to directive leadership

Hsi‐Fang Lai, Shin‐Guang Liang
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

When sharing power leads to taking it back: A shift from empowering to directive leadership

Hsi‐Fang Lai, Shin‐Guang Liang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Leader behaviour shifts across days, and empowering acts may shape leaders' subsequent self‐regulation. Using a leader‐centric, within‐person lens, we test whether daily empowering leadership is associated with self‐regulatory demands and when such demands arise. Drawing on control theory, we argue that power sharing requires continual calibration to keep autonomy and accountability aligned and may coincide with higher day‐level regulatory strain indexed by leaders' self‐reported ego depletion. We further propose that this strain is more likely when subordinates are low in proactive personality, and that strain is associated with greater directive leadership the next day as a structured response. We tested these expectations in a 10‐day experience‐sampling study of 129 supervisor–subordinate dyads (719 observations) in a military setting. Multilevel lagged analyses showed a conditional pattern consistent with next‐day strain and the subsequent shift towards directive behaviour. These findings clarify when empowerment becomes harder to sustain and how leaders adapt by increasing structure.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyVol. 99(1)
National Chung Cheng University (TW), Yuan Ze University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.