Feasibility and acceptability of using ABPM to manage hypertension in primary care: a qualitative study

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) offers advantages over conventional methods in hypertension diagnosis and monitoring; however, it is underutilised in primary care. This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of ABPM among primary care providers (PCPs) in Singapore. The study used a qualitative research design. Between August 2022 to January 2024, eleven primary care physicians (PCPs) from two public primary care clinics in the Eastern region of Singapore were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim before thematic analysis. Three main themes emerged: utility of ABPM, challenges to implementing ABPM, and utility and usability of the ABPM reports. PCPs recognised the value of ABPM in optimising hypertension management in primary care, particularly in addressing diagnostic dilemmas, guiding medication titration, and facilitating patient counselling. They also emphasised the importance of a user-friendly ABPM report to support clinical decision-making. However, implementation challenges were identified, including challenges in explaining ABPM to patients due to limited time and resources, unfamiliarity with its workflow and uncertainty in follow-up action for ABPM reported hypertension phenotypes. Additionally, some PCPs stressed that ABPM should be applied selectively and is not appropriate for all patients with hypertension. While PCPs recognised the benefits of ABPM for accurate hypertension diagnosis and clinical decision-making, significant barriers remain. Addressing concerns about limited time, resources, and workflow integration is crucial for the broader adoption of ABPM in primary care settings. While user-friendly reports are preferred, careful attention to their design and presentation is essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Primary Care
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03166-5
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and acceptability of using ABPM to manage hypertension in primary care: a qualitative study

Andrew Ang, Zi Ying Chang, Ian Kwong Yun Phoon, Angelina S Lim et al.
BMC Primary Care
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Feasibility and acceptability of using ABPM to manage hypertension in primary care: a qualitative study

Andrew Ang, Zi Ying Chang, Ian Kwong Yun Phoon, Angelina S Lim, Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Chirk Jenn Ng, Hao Yuan Loh, Melvin Yuansheng Sng, Ding Xuan Ng, Eric Kam Pui Lee, Jonathan Yap, Weiting Huang, Ariffin Kawaja
article en

Abstract

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) offers advantages over conventional methods in hypertension diagnosis and monitoring; however, it is underutilised in primary care. This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of ABPM among primary care providers (PCPs) in Singapore. The study used a qualitative research design. Between August 2022 to January 2024, eleven primary care physicians (PCPs) from two public primary care clinics in the Eastern region of Singapore were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim before thematic analysis. Three main themes emerged: utility of ABPM, challenges to implementing ABPM, and utility and usability of the ABPM reports. PCPs recognised the value of ABPM in optimising hypertension management in primary care, particularly in addressing diagnostic dilemmas, guiding medication titration, and facilitating patient counselling. They also emphasised the importance of a user-friendly ABPM report to support clinical decision-making. However, implementation challenges were identified, including challenges in explaining ABPM to patients due to limited time and resources, unfamiliarity with its workflow and uncertainty in follow-up action for ABPM reported hypertension phenotypes. Additionally, some PCPs stressed that ABPM should be applied selectively and is not appropriate for all patients with hypertension. While PCPs recognised the benefits of ABPM for accurate hypertension diagnosis and clinical decision-making, significant barriers remain. Addressing concerns about limited time, resources, and workflow integration is crucial for the broader adoption of ABPM in primary care settings. While user-friendly reports are preferred, careful attention to their design and presentation is essential.

BMC Primary CareVol. 27(1)
Ministry of Health (SG), SingHealth (SG), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre (SG), Hong Kong Jockey Club (HK), SingHealth Polyclinics (SG), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), National Heart Centre Singapore (SG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.