Enhancing credit risk prediction via voting classifier and meta-dynamic ensemble selection on imbalanced data

Credit risk assessment plays a crucial role in financial decision-making, but imbalanced datasets present significant challenges, leading to biased predictions and poor classification of defaulters. Traditional techniques such as under-sampling, over-sampling, and SMOTE aim to address this imbalance but suffer from issues like information loss, lack of diversity, and duplicated patterns. To address these issues, we propose a novel two-stage classification framework that integrates a Voting Classifier with Meta-Dynamic Ensemble Selection (Meta-DES). The first stage employs a voting classifier to make confident predictions while isolating ambiguous instances. The second stage applies Meta-DES to dynamically select the most competent classifiers based on meta-features and the region of competence. This approach enhances classification performance by refining uncertain predictions through meta-learning and leveraging ensemble techniques to improve robustness. Extensive experimentation on a real-world loan application dataset demonstrates that our approach significantly outperforms traditional machine learning models. Our method maintains reliable predictions as demonstrated by comprehensive performance evaluations. The proposed model achieves superior precision and recall, outperforming traditional classifiers. Experimental results highlight its balanced performance in distinguishing defaulters and non-defaulters, achieving an accuracy of 0.8332, with significantly improved F1 scores. Additionally, statistical validation using the McNemar test confirms the superiority of our approach over baseline models, with overwhelmingly significant results. By effectively reducing Type I and Type II errors, our approach enhances financial risk assessment and supports more reliable credit decision-making. The proposed methodology not only improves classification outcomes but also contributes to minimizing financial losses and optimizing lending strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-00849-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
90.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing credit risk prediction via voting classifier and meta-dynamic ensemble selection on imbalanced data

Gordhan Jethava, Umang Soni
1 citations
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
90.39
article

Enhancing credit risk prediction via voting classifier and meta-dynamic ensemble selection on imbalanced data

Gordhan Jethava, Umang Soni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Credit risk assessment plays a crucial role in financial decision-making, but imbalanced datasets present significant challenges, leading to biased predictions and poor classification of defaulters. Traditional techniques such as under-sampling, over-sampling, and SMOTE aim to address this imbalance but suffer from issues like information loss, lack of diversity, and duplicated patterns. To address these issues, we propose a novel two-stage classification framework that integrates a Voting Classifier with Meta-Dynamic Ensemble Selection (Meta-DES). The first stage employs a voting classifier to make confident predictions while isolating ambiguous instances. The second stage applies Meta-DES to dynamically select the most competent classifiers based on meta-features and the region of competence. This approach enhances classification performance by refining uncertain predictions through meta-learning and leveraging ensemble techniques to improve robustness. Extensive experimentation on a real-world loan application dataset demonstrates that our approach significantly outperforms traditional machine learning models. Our method maintains reliable predictions as demonstrated by comprehensive performance evaluations. The proposed model achieves superior precision and recall, outperforming traditional classifiers. Experimental results highlight its balanced performance in distinguishing defaulters and non-defaulters, achieving an accuracy of 0.8332, with significantly improved F1 scores. Additionally, statistical validation using the McNemar test confirms the superiority of our approach over baseline models, with overwhelmingly significant results. By effectively reducing Type I and Type II errors, our approach enhances financial risk assessment and supports more reliable credit decision-making. The proposed methodology not only improves classification outcomes but also contributes to minimizing financial losses and optimizing lending strategies.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6(1)
Parul University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
90.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.