A cross-sectional assessment of osteoporosis and its risk factors using ultrasound-derived T scores and fracture risk assessment tool in an Indian population

Abstract Background: Osteoporosis is a major global health problem, affecting approximately one in five people worldwide, with a pooled prevalence of 18.3%. Early diagnosis using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) combined with the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) can reduce osteoporotic fractures. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the occurrence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in adults, evaluate associated risk factors, and estimate fracture risk using QUS and FRAX. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 265 participants. Sociodemographic data, osteoporosis risk factors, fracture history, and reproductive history (for women) were collected. Height and weight were measured, and bone mineral density at the right calcaneus was determined using a Paltech CM 200 densitometer. Bone health was classified by T-score (normal: ≥−1.0; osteopenia: −2.5 to −1.0; osteoporosis: ≤−2.5). Fracture risk was calculated with the India-specific FRAX tool automated through a Python script. Statistical analyses were performed in R using Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: Of the 265 participants, 108 (40.8%) had osteoporosis, 76 (28.7%) osteopenia, and 81 (30.6%) normal bone health. Osteoporosis was significantly associated with female sex ( P = 0.0282), age over 35 years ( P < 0.001), parity ( P = 0.000023), and postmenopausal status ( P < 0.0001). The mean 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability was 1.67 ± 1.26, and hip fracture probability was 0.27 ± 0.43. Conclusion: The use of QUS and FRA tools demonstrates their value in identifying individuals at heightened risk, supporting the need for screening and tailored interventions to prevent osteoporosis-related morbidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/mjhs.mjhs_102_25
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional assessment of osteoporosis and its risk factors using ultrasound-derived T scores and fracture risk assessment tool in an Indian population

Kavyasri Kotte, Sameer Valsangkar, Shravani Sreeram, Sudha Bala
MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

A cross-sectional assessment of osteoporosis and its risk factors using ultrasound-derived T scores and fracture risk assessment tool in an Indian population

Kavyasri Kotte, Sameer Valsangkar, Shravani Sreeram, Sudha Bala
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Osteoporosis is a major global health problem, affecting approximately one in five people worldwide, with a pooled prevalence of 18.3%. Early diagnosis using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) combined with the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) can reduce osteoporotic fractures. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the occurrence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in adults, evaluate associated risk factors, and estimate fracture risk using QUS and FRAX. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 265 participants. Sociodemographic data, osteoporosis risk factors, fracture history, and reproductive history (for women) were collected. Height and weight were measured, and bone mineral density at the right calcaneus was determined using a Paltech CM 200 densitometer. Bone health was classified by T-score (normal: ≥−1.0; osteopenia: −2.5 to −1.0; osteoporosis: ≤−2.5). Fracture risk was calculated with the India-specific FRAX tool automated through a Python script. Statistical analyses were performed in R using Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: Of the 265 participants, 108 (40.8%) had osteoporosis, 76 (28.7%) osteopenia, and 81 (30.6%) normal bone health. Osteoporosis was significantly associated with female sex ( P = 0.0282), age over 35 years ( P < 0.001), parity ( P = 0.000023), and postmenopausal status ( P < 0.0001). The mean 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability was 1.67 ± 1.26, and hip fracture probability was 0.27 ± 0.43. Conclusion: The use of QUS and FRA tools demonstrates their value in identifying individuals at heightened risk, supporting the need for screening and tailored interventions to prevent osteoporosis-related morbidity.

MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences
Deccan College of Medical Sciences (IN), Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.