Paradoxes of standardization: digital divide and adaptive strategies for reforming the Unified State Exam

The study analyzes the paradoxes of the Unified State Exam (USE) in the Russian education system: formal equality of access to universities and a decline in corruption coexist with excessive standardization, a decline in knowledge depth, increased stress, and deepening social inequality through the commercialization of training. The study was conducted in two stages: the first included focus groups with subject teachers (April 2022, n=6–10 per group, analyzed in MAXQDA 2024); the second stage was a nationwide survey using the CATI method (n=1,500, April-May 2024, processed in SPSS Statistics 26). A key conflict was identified between the standardization of the USE and the quality of education, manifested in a decline in students' cognitive abilities, increased stress, and increased regional inequality. The survey confirmed negative perceptions of the USE and identified proposals for reform, including the choice of a certification form and the transfer of the exam to specialized centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Research and Development Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2025-14-4-29-38
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradoxes of standardization: digital divide and adaptive strategies for reforming the Unified State Exam

Elena A. Derevyanchenko, Iurii Derevianchenko
Scientific Research and Development Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

Paradoxes of standardization: digital divide and adaptive strategies for reforming the Unified State Exam

Elena A. Derevyanchenko, Iurii Derevianchenko
article en

Abstract

The study analyzes the paradoxes of the Unified State Exam (USE) in the Russian education system: formal equality of access to universities and a decline in corruption coexist with excessive standardization, a decline in knowledge depth, increased stress, and deepening social inequality through the commercialization of training. The study was conducted in two stages: the first included focus groups with subject teachers (April 2022, n=6–10 per group, analyzed in MAXQDA 2024); the second stage was a nationwide survey using the CATI method (n=1,500, April-May 2024, processed in SPSS Statistics 26). A key conflict was identified between the standardization of the USE and the quality of education, manifested in a decline in students' cognitive abilities, increased stress, and increased regional inequality. The survey confirmed negative perceptions of the USE and identified proposals for reform, including the choice of a certification form and the transfer of the exam to specialized centers.

Scientific Research and Development Socio-Humanitarian Research and TechnologyVol. 14(4)
Omsk State University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Paradoxes of standardization: digital divide and adaptive strategies for reforming the Unified State Exam — Elena A. Derevyanchenko, Iurii Derevianchenko · Scientific Research and Development Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS