Spatial strategies in non-territorial societies: how feral horses maintain boundaries with other groups

Encounters between competitive individuals or groups are common in social animals and can involve costly aggression; thus, animals often employ strategies to minimize direct conflict. However, research on whether and how animals adjust their group spatial structure when they encounter or spatially co-occur with a different group remains limited. We investigated how non-territorial units in feral horse multilevel societies manage spatial encounters with neighbouring units. We observed 25 reproductive units in northern Portugal, using drones, and employed statistical analyses to quantify spatial dynamics. We found that horses actively adjusted their spatial formations depending on the proximity of other units. Units became more circular and cohesive when other units approached, but when extremely close, they elongated their shapes to avoid boundary crossings. These adjustments indicate that horses maintain flexible unit boundaries to prevent mixing with other units. A notable exception was a particular pair of units that frequently crossed boundaries and intermixed, representing a unique social level within the horse multilevel society. Overall, our findings indicate that feral horses respond adaptively to inter-unit encounters by balancing the benefits of aggregation with the need to reduce direct overlap, providing new insights into the spatial organization of non-territorial societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2468
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial strategies in non-territorial societies: how feral horses maintain boundaries with other groups

Monamie Ringhofer, Sota Inoue, Tamao Maeda, Shinya Yamamoto et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Spatial strategies in non-territorial societies: how feral horses maintain boundaries with other groups

Monamie Ringhofer, Sota Inoue, Tamao Maeda, Shinya Yamamoto, Satoshi Hirata
article en

Abstract

Encounters between competitive individuals or groups are common in social animals and can involve costly aggression; thus, animals often employ strategies to minimize direct conflict. However, research on whether and how animals adjust their group spatial structure when they encounter or spatially co-occur with a different group remains limited. We investigated how non-territorial units in feral horse multilevel societies manage spatial encounters with neighbouring units. We observed 25 reproductive units in northern Portugal, using drones, and employed statistical analyses to quantify spatial dynamics. We found that horses actively adjusted their spatial formations depending on the proximity of other units. Units became more circular and cohesive when other units approached, but when extremely close, they elongated their shapes to avoid boundary crossings. These adjustments indicate that horses maintain flexible unit boundaries to prevent mixing with other units. A notable exception was a particular pair of units that frequently crossed boundaries and intermixed, representing a unique social level within the horse multilevel society. Overall, our findings indicate that feral horses respond adaptively to inter-unit encounters by balancing the benefits of aggregation with the need to reduce direct overlap, providing new insights into the spatial organization of non-territorial societies.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2063)
Osaka University of Economics (JP), Teikyo University of Science (JP), The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Kyoto University of Education (JP), Nagoya University (JP), Teikyo University (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.