Beyond Accuracy: The Cognitive Economy of Trust and Absorption in the Adoption of AI-Generated Forecasts

AI Recommender Systems (RecSys) function as personalised forecasting engines, predicting user preferences to reduce information overload. However, the efficacy of these systems is often bottlenecked by the “Last Mile” of forecasting: the end-user’s willingness to adopt and rely on the prediction. While the existing literature often assumes that algorithmic accuracy (e.g., low RMSE) automatically drives utilisation, empirical evidence suggests that users frequently reject accurate forecasts due to a lack of trust or cognitive friction. This study challenges the utilitarian view that users adopt systems simply because they are useful, instead proposing that sustainable adoption requires a state of Cognitive Absorption—a psychological flow state enabled by the Cognitive Economy of trust. Grounded in the Motivation–Opportunity–Ability (MOA) framework, we developed the Trust–Absorption–Intention (TAI) model. We analysed data from 366 users of a major predictive platform using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The Disjoint Two-Stage Approach was employed to model the reflective–formative Higher-Order Constructs. The results demonstrate that Cognitive Trust (specifically the relational dimensions of Benevolence and Integrity) operates via a dual pathway. It drives adoption directly, serving as a mechanism of Cognitive Economy where users suspend vigilance to rely on the AI as a heuristic, while simultaneously freeing mental resources to enter a state of Cognitive Absorption. Affective Trust further drives this immersion by fostering curiosity. Crucially, Cognitive Absorption partially mediates the relationship between Cognitive Trust and adoption intention, whereas it fully mediates the impact of Affective Trust. This indicates that while Cognitive Trust can drive reliance directly as a rational shortcut, Affective Trust translates to adoption only when it successfully triggers a flow state. This study bridges the gap between algorithmic forecasting and behavioural adoption. It introduces the Cognitive Economy perspective: Trust reduces the cognitive cost of verifying predictions, allowing users to outsource decision-making to the AI and enter a state of effortless immersion. For designers of AI forecasting agents, the findings suggest that maximising accuracy may be less effective than minimising cognitive friction for sustaining long-term adoption. To solve the cold start problem, platforms should be designed for flow by building emotional rapport and explainability, thereby converting sporadic users into continuous data contributors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forecasting
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8010008
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Accuracy: The Cognitive Economy of Trust and Absorption in the Adoption of AI-Generated Forecasts

Anne-Marie Sassenberg, Nirmal Acharya, Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, Padmaja Kar
Forecasting
AI in Service Interactions
article

Beyond Accuracy: The Cognitive Economy of Trust and Absorption in the Adoption of AI-Generated Forecasts

Anne-Marie Sassenberg, Nirmal Acharya, Mohammad Sadegh Eshaghi, Padmaja Kar
article en

Abstract

AI Recommender Systems (RecSys) function as personalised forecasting engines, predicting user preferences to reduce information overload. However, the efficacy of these systems is often bottlenecked by the “Last Mile” of forecasting: the end-user’s willingness to adopt and rely on the prediction. While the existing literature often assumes that algorithmic accuracy (e.g., low RMSE) automatically drives utilisation, empirical evidence suggests that users frequently reject accurate forecasts due to a lack of trust or cognitive friction. This study challenges the utilitarian view that users adopt systems simply because they are useful, instead proposing that sustainable adoption requires a state of Cognitive Absorption—a psychological flow state enabled by the Cognitive Economy of trust. Grounded in the Motivation–Opportunity–Ability (MOA) framework, we developed the Trust–Absorption–Intention (TAI) model. We analysed data from 366 users of a major predictive platform using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The Disjoint Two-Stage Approach was employed to model the reflective–formative Higher-Order Constructs. The results demonstrate that Cognitive Trust (specifically the relational dimensions of Benevolence and Integrity) operates via a dual pathway. It drives adoption directly, serving as a mechanism of Cognitive Economy where users suspend vigilance to rely on the AI as a heuristic, while simultaneously freeing mental resources to enter a state of Cognitive Absorption. Affective Trust further drives this immersion by fostering curiosity. Crucially, Cognitive Absorption partially mediates the relationship between Cognitive Trust and adoption intention, whereas it fully mediates the impact of Affective Trust. This indicates that while Cognitive Trust can drive reliance directly as a rational shortcut, Affective Trust translates to adoption only when it successfully triggers a flow state. This study bridges the gap between algorithmic forecasting and behavioural adoption. It introduces the Cognitive Economy perspective: Trust reduces the cognitive cost of verifying predictions, allowing users to outsource decision-making to the AI and enter a state of effortless immersion. For designers of AI forecasting agents, the findings suggest that maximising accuracy may be less effective than minimising cognitive friction for sustaining long-term adoption. To solve the cold start problem, platforms should be designed for flow by building emotional rapport and explainability, thereby converting sporadic users into continuous data contributors.

ForecastingVol. 8(1)
University of Southern Queensland (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.