The neural correlates of shared and individual experience

We set out to explore the neural correlates of individual-specific experiences. We propose an approach through which we compute individual-specific dynamics of functional connectivity states. These dynamics do not require estimation of common states across individuals and can be directly related to dynamic behavioural ratings of subjective experience. To this end, we leverage a unique functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset where subjects listened to an engaging naturalistic story while awake and under different levels of anaesthesia, altering or abolishing conscious experience. We find that this method can detect correspondences between neural and subjective dynamics. We then show that the dynamics of the default mode network are more dissimilar between participants during awareness compared to unconsciousness and therefore may tend to underlie more personal experiences of the story. On the other hand, the auditory and posterior dorsal attention networks show higher inter-subject similarity in consciousness compared to unconsciousness and suggest that the dynamics of these networks support more "generalisable" experiences of the story. We further characterise individual-specific brain dynamics by showing that they are associated with higher complexity in consciousness, whilst conversely, brain dynamics underlying shared experience become less complex during the conscious experience of the story.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09355-3
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The neural correlates of shared and individual experience

Peter Coppola, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, David K. Menon, Adrian M. Owen
Communications Biology
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

The neural correlates of shared and individual experience

Peter Coppola, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis, David K. Menon, Adrian M. Owen
article en

Abstract

We set out to explore the neural correlates of individual-specific experiences. We propose an approach through which we compute individual-specific dynamics of functional connectivity states. These dynamics do not require estimation of common states across individuals and can be directly related to dynamic behavioural ratings of subjective experience. To this end, we leverage a unique functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset where subjects listened to an engaging naturalistic story while awake and under different levels of anaesthesia, altering or abolishing conscious experience. We find that this method can detect correspondences between neural and subjective dynamics. We then show that the dynamics of the default mode network are more dissimilar between participants during awareness compared to unconsciousness and therefore may tend to underlie more personal experiences of the story. On the other hand, the auditory and posterior dorsal attention networks show higher inter-subject similarity in consciousness compared to unconsciousness and suggest that the dynamics of these networks support more "generalisable" experiences of the story. We further characterise individual-specific brain dynamics by showing that they are associated with higher complexity in consciousness, whilst conversely, brain dynamics underlying shared experience become less complex during the conscious experience of the story.

Communications BiologyVol. 9(1)
Western University (CA), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Cambridge (GB), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada, Cambridge Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.