Call Me Maybe?An Experimental Analysis of Donor Backlash to Voluntary Nonprofit Fraud Disclosure

Whether by embezzlement, theft, or other illegal actions, not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) must report significant asset diversions (i.e., fraud) on IRS Form 990. Given the inherent delay in providing annual tax filings, NFPs may choose to voluntarily alert donors to occurrences of fraud in a timelier manner. Prior research has not yet examined the effects of the source or context of such disclosures. In this study, we examine how the source of an NFP’s voluntary fraud disclosure affects donors’ subsequent giving decisions. We find that differently-sourced voluntary fraud disclosures lead to divergent levels of donor backlash depending on a donor’s prior involvement with the organization. Specifically, involved donors respond more favorably to a fraud disclosure made by the board of directors versus one made by management. Our findings have implications for how NFPs can communicate with donors about fraud and potentially minimize post-fraud organizational damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640251410568
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Call Me Maybe?An Experimental Analysis of Donor Backlash to Voluntary Nonprofit Fraud Disclosure

Julie M. Mercado, Jonathan Kugel
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Call Me Maybe?An Experimental Analysis of Donor Backlash to Voluntary Nonprofit Fraud Disclosure

Julie M. Mercado, Jonathan Kugel
article en

Abstract

Whether by embezzlement, theft, or other illegal actions, not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) must report significant asset diversions (i.e., fraud) on IRS Form 990. Given the inherent delay in providing annual tax filings, NFPs may choose to voluntarily alert donors to occurrences of fraud in a timelier manner. Prior research has not yet examined the effects of the source or context of such disclosures. In this study, we examine how the source of an NFP’s voluntary fraud disclosure affects donors’ subsequent giving decisions. We find that differently-sourced voluntary fraud disclosures lead to divergent levels of donor backlash depending on a donor’s prior involvement with the organization. Specifically, involved donors respond more favorably to a fraud disclosure made by the board of directors versus one made by management. Our findings have implications for how NFPs can communicate with donors about fraud and potentially minimize post-fraud organizational damage.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Bucknell University (US), Christopher Newport University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.