Hypothetical enrollment – an anticipatory situated method to assess the implementation of AI diagnostics in clinical settings

Purpose The paper aims to propose “hypothetical enrollment” as an anticipatory, situated and performative methodological approach to appreciate the organizational and epistemological consequences of adopting artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostics into clinical settings. This method provides a methodological contribution to move between the expectations about AI diagnostics and their integration into real-world, clinical settings. Design/methodology/approach The validity of this method was tested against an empirical case, the start-up Autism Scope (AS), which applies machine learning models for the early detection of autism spectrum disorder. As part of this pilot study, two interviews were conducted in person with designers from AS and three interviews with pediatric neuropsychiatrists. Findings Notwithstanding a generally positive attitude, several organizational and professional challenges emerged thanks to this method, such as the integration of the tool into hospital workflows and the potential effects for professional identity in neuropsychiatry. Research limitations/implications Other healthcare stakeholders, such as hospital mangers or policy makers, were not interviewed. Originality/value The “hypothetical enrollment” interviews allowed comparing the expectations and implementation strategies devised by AS’ designers with the impediments and challenges highlighted by neuropsychiatrists, that is, potential users who have not been involved in development yet.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Workplace Learning
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-07-2025-0214
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypothetical enrollment – an anticipatory situated method to assess the implementation of AI diagnostics in clinical settings

Claudia Montanaro, Lorenzo Olivieri, Annalisa Pelizza
Journal of Workplace Learning
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Hypothetical enrollment – an anticipatory situated method to assess the implementation of AI diagnostics in clinical settings

Claudia Montanaro, Lorenzo Olivieri, Annalisa Pelizza
article en

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to propose “hypothetical enrollment” as an anticipatory, situated and performative methodological approach to appreciate the organizational and epistemological consequences of adopting artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostics into clinical settings. This method provides a methodological contribution to move between the expectations about AI diagnostics and their integration into real-world, clinical settings. Design/methodology/approach The validity of this method was tested against an empirical case, the start-up Autism Scope (AS), which applies machine learning models for the early detection of autism spectrum disorder. As part of this pilot study, two interviews were conducted in person with designers from AS and three interviews with pediatric neuropsychiatrists. Findings Notwithstanding a generally positive attitude, several organizational and professional challenges emerged thanks to this method, such as the integration of the tool into hospital workflows and the potential effects for professional identity in neuropsychiatry. Research limitations/implications Other healthcare stakeholders, such as hospital mangers or policy makers, were not interviewed. Originality/value The “hypothetical enrollment” interviews allowed comparing the expectations and implementation strategies devised by AS’ designers with the impediments and challenges highlighted by neuropsychiatrists, that is, potential users who have not been involved in development yet.

Journal of Workplace Learning
Aarhus University (DK), GNA University (IN), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.